Abstract:One of the most commonly used techniques in aerospace engineering is the RANS (Reynolds average Navier–Stokes) approach for calculating the transonic compressor flow field, where the accuracy of the computation is significantly affected by the turbulence model used. In this work, we use SA, SST, k-ɛ, and the PAFV turbulence model developed based on the side-biased mean fluctuations velocity and the mean strain rate tensor to numerically simulate the transonic compressor NASA Rotor 67 to evaluate the accuracy of turbulence modeling in numerical calculations of transonic compressors. The simulation results demonstrate that the four turbulence models are generally superior in the numerical computation of NASA Rotor 67, which essentially satisfies the requirements of the accuracy of engineering calculations; by comparing and analyzing the ability of the four turbulence models to predict the aerodynamic performance of transonic compressors and to capture the details of the flow inside the rotor. The errors of the Rotor 67 clogging flow rate calculated by the SA, SST, k-ɛ, and PAFV turbulence models with the experimental data are 0.9%, 0.8%, 0.7%, and 0.6%, respectively. The errors of the calculated peak efficiencies are 2.2%, 1.6%, 0.9%, and 4.9%. The SA and SST turbulence models were developed for the computational characteristics of the aerospace industry. Their computational stability is better and their outputs for Rotor 67 are comparable. The k-ɛ turbulence model calculates the pressure ratio and efficiency that are closest to the experimental data, but the computation of its details of the flow field near the wall surface is not ideal because the k-ɛ turbulence model cannot accurately capture the flow characteristics of the region of high shear stresses. The PAFV turbulence model has a better prediction of complex phenomena such as rotor internal shock wave location, shock–boundary layer interaction, etc., due to the use of a turbulent velocity scale in vector form, but the calculated rotor efficiency is small.

Uncertainty Quantification of Spalart–Allmaras Turbulence Model Coefficients for Simplified Compressor Flow Features

Uncertainty Quantification of Spalart–Allmaras Turbulence Model Coefficients for Compressor Stall

Quantification Of Performance Uncertainty For A Transonic Compressor Rotor Using An Adaptive Nipc Method

Uncertainty Analysis of Turbulence Model in Capturing Flows Involving Laminarization and Retransition

Bayesian uncertainty analysis of SA turbulence model for supersonic jet interaction simulations

Uncertainty Quantification of SSG/LRR-ω Turbulence Model Closure Coefficients

Bayesian Uncertainty Quantification Analysis of the SST Model for Transonic Flow Around Airfoils Simulation

Quantifying and Reducing Model-Form Uncertainties in Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes Simulations: A Data-Driven, Physics-Informed Bayesian Approach

Investigation on the Performance Prediction of Single-Stage Axial Compressor by Using Different Turbulence Models

Deficiencies in the Spalart–Allmaras Turbulence Model for the Prediction of the Stability Boundary in Highly Loaded Compressors

Uncertainty Analysis and Calibration of SST Turbulence Model for Free Shear Layer in Cavity-Ramp Flow

Numerical Investigation of Corner Separation Flow Using Spalart-Allmaras Model with Various Modifications

Characterization of Model-Based Uncertainties in Incompressible Turbulent Flows by Machine Learning

Assessment of advanced RANS turbulence models for prediction of complex flows in compressors

Quantification of Model Uncertainty in RANS Simulations: A Review

Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis of SST Turbulence Model on Hypersonic Flow Heat Transfer

Numerical simulation of unsteady single-stage transonic axial compressor flow

Global Sensitivity Analysis and Estimation of Model Error, Toward Uncertainty Quantification in Scramjet Computations

Uncertainty Quantification of K-Ω Turbulence Model for Hypersonic Flow

Machine learning based uncertainty quantification of turbulence model for airfoils

Numerical Simulation of Transonic Compressors with Different Turbulence Models