Abstract:With the ever-increasing use of Reynolds-Averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) simulations in mission-critical applications, the quantification of model-form uncertainty in RANS models has attracted attention in the turbulence modeling community. Recently, a physics-based nonparametric approach for quantifying model-form uncertainty in RANS simulations has been proposed, where Reynolds stresses are projected to physically meaningful dimensions and perturbations are introduced only in the physically realizable limits (Xiao et al., 2016). However, a challenge associated with this approach is to assess the amount of information introduced in the prior distribution and to avoid imposing unwarranted constraints. In this work we propose a random matrix approach for quantifying model-form uncertainties in RANS simulations with the realizability of the Reynolds stress guaranteed, which is achieved by construction from the Cholesky factorization of the normalized Reynolds stress tensor. Furthermore, the maximum entropy principle is used to identify the probability distribution that satisfies the constraints from available information but without introducing artificial constraints. We demonstrate that the proposed approach is able to ensure the realizability of the Reynolds stress, albeit in a different manner from the physics-based approach. Monte Carlo sampling of the obtained probability distribution is achieved by using polynomial chaos expansion to map independent Gaussian random fields to the Reynolds stress random field with the marginal distributions and correlation structures as specified. Numerical simulations on a typical flow with separation have shown physically reasonable results, which verify the proposed approach. Therefore, the proposed method is a promising alternative to the physics-based approach for model-form uncertainty quantification of RANS simulations. The method explored in this work is general and can be extended to other complex physical systems in applied mechanics and engineering. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Assessing turbulence sensitivity using stochastic Monte Carlo analysis

Analysis on Numerical Stability and Convergence of Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes Simulations from the Perspective of Coupling Modes

Obtaining the mean fields with known Reynolds stresses at steady state

Analysis on Numerical Stability and Convergence of RANS Turbulence Models from the Perspective of Coupling Modes

Uncertainty Analysis of Turbulence Model in Capturing Flows Involving Laminarization and Retransition

Effects of numerical method of source terms in turbulence models

Sensitivity Analysis of Inflow Conditions and Turbulence Models on Wind Turbine Wake Simulation Using an AD/RANS Approach

Uncertainty Quantification of SSG/LRR-ω Turbulence Model Closure Coefficients

Uncertainty Quantification of Spalart–Allmaras Turbulence Model Coefficients for Simplified Compressor Flow Features

Assessment of Rans to Predict Flows with Large Streamline Curvature

Characterization of Model-Based Uncertainties in Incompressible Turbulent Flows by Machine Learning

Turbulence Modeling in the Age of Data

A Random Matrix Approach for Quantifying Model-Form Uncertainties in Turbulence Modeling

A turbulent eddy-viscosity surrogate modeling framework for Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes simulations

Uncertainty Analysis and Calibration of SST Turbulence Model for Free Shear Layer in Cavity-Ramp Flow

Implication of Mismatch Between Stress and Strain-Rate in Turbulence Subjected to Rapid Straining and Destraining on Dynamic LES Models

Quantifying and Reducing Model-Form Uncertainties in Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes Simulations: A Data-Driven, Physics-Informed Bayesian Approach

Assessment of Neural Network Augmented Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes Turbulence Model in Extrapolation Modes

Artificial neural network approach for turbulence models: A local framework

Selection of turbulence models via multiscaling analysis of an axisymmetric pipe flow and heat transfer

Data-driven turbulence modeling