Abstract:Although Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations are still the dominant tool for engineering design and analysis applications involving turbulent flows, standard RANS models are known to be unreliable in many flows of engineering relevance, including flows with separation, strong pressure gradients or mean flow curvature. With increasing amounts of 3-dimensional experimental data and high fidelity simulation data from Large Eddy Simulation (LES) and Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS), data-driven turbulence modeling has become a promising approach to increase the predictive capability of RANS simulations. However, the prediction performance of data-driven models inevitably depends on the choices of training flows. This work aims to identify a quantitative measure for a priori estimation of prediction confidence in data-driven turbulence modeling. This measure represents the distance in feature space between the training flows and the flow to be predicted. Specifically, the Mahalanobis distance and the kernel density estimation (KDE) technique are used as metrics to quantify the distance between flow data sets in feature space. To examine the relationship between these two extrapolation metrics and the machine learning model prediction performance, the flow over periodic hills at Re = 10595 is used as test set and seven flows with different configurations are individually used as training sets. The results show that the prediction error of the Reynolds stress anisotropy is positively correlated with Mahalanobis distance and KDE distance, demonstrating that both extrapolation metrics can be used to estimate the prediction confidence a priori . A quantitative comparison using correlation coefficients shows that the Mahalanobis distance is less accurate in estimating the prediction confidence than KDE distance. The extrapolation metrics introduced in this work and the corresponding analysis provide an approach to aid in the choice of data source and to assess the prediction performance for data-driven turbulence modeling.

Obtaining the mean fields with known Reynolds stresses at steady state

Computing Mean Fields with Known Reynolds Stresses at Steady State

Analysis on Numerical Stability and Convergence of Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes Simulations from the Perspective of Coupling Modes

Practical Framework for Data-Driven RANS Modeling with Data Augmentation

Analysis on Numerical Stability and Convergence of RANS Turbulence Models from the Perspective of Coupling Modes

Physics-informed Machine Learning Approach for Reconstructing Reynolds Stress Modeling Discrepancies Based on DNS Data

Data-driven RANS closures for improving mean field calculation of separated flows

Data-augmented Turbulence Modeling by Reconstructing Reynolds Stress Discrepancies for Adverse-Pressure-gradient Flows

Are Discrepancies in RANS Modeled Reynolds Stresses Random

Physics-informed Machine Learning Approach for Augmenting Turbulence Models: A Comprehensive Framework

Prediction of Reynolds Stresses in High-Mach-number Turbulent Boundary Layers Using Physics-Informed Machine Learning

An iterative data-driven turbulence modeling framework based on Reynolds stress representation

A Semi-Implicit Discrepancy Model of Reynolds Stress in a Higher-Order Tensor Basis Framework for Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes Simulations

Machine Learning Based Reynolds Averaged Simulation of Backward-Facing Step Flows at Different Reynolds Numbers

Mean-flow Data Assimilation based on minimal correction of turbulence models: application to turbulent high-Reynolds number backward-facing step

Determining a priori a RANS model's applicable range via global epistemic uncertainty quantification

A data‐driven turbulence modeling for the Reynolds stress tensor transport equation

STREAMWISE VORTICES AND REYNOLDS STRESSES OF WALL-BOUNDED TURBULENT SHEAR FLOWS

Data Augmented Prediction of Reynolds Stresses for Flows Around an Axisymmetric Body of Revolution

A Priori Assessment of Prediction Confidence for Data-Driven Turbulence Modeling