Abstract:Historic waterworks, including aqueducts and sewers, are civil engineering achievements with unique heritage management challenges. Often designed to be silent and unseen, the subgrade and inaudible infrastructure that delivers water and removes waste is frequently ignored by the public unless it stops working. Although these systems can benefit from official designation as heritage, they are infrequently given this benefit, as the water and wastewater management community that is responsible for them often remains disconnected from the heritage management community. I argue for the establishment of best practice guidelines on the stewardship of historic waterworks infrastructure. Further, I examine the need to evaluate historic significance and identify character-defining features as well as to promote rehabilitation, redundancy, and sustainability of active elements. This discussion is illustrated by the cases of the Aqua Virgo and the Cloaca Maxima of Ancient Rome, the karez of China’s Turpan Province, the Jerome Park Reservoir and Water Tunnel No. 3 in New York City, and the mamanteo canals of Peru. In addition, I recommend strongly that water and wastewater managers and preservationists consider adaptive use of historic waterworks infrastructure after they are decommissioned from active use. Vibrant examples of repurposing are included from around the world, including subgrade sewers, cisterns, and weirs, as well as above-grade gatehouses, wastewater treatment plants, and pumping stations. The heroic civil engineering achievements of the past were often realized amidst the need for social change. In particular, water infrastructure systems, such as gravity-fed aqueducts, delivered reliable sources of potable water to communities while also consistently reducing outbreaks of disease and fire. Preservation of this heritage poses multiple challenges, owing, in part, to the inaudibility and invisibility of these systems, the general public’s limited awareness of this heritage’s civil engineering significance, underrepresentation in World Heritage listings, and limited funding from government agencies that often privilege utility over aesthetics. Although it is inextricably linked to cultural, agrarian, industrial, and maritime landscapes in urban and rural communities worldwide, this infrastructural heritage can suffer unsympathetic alteration, encroachment, obsolescence, demolition, and abandonment. Nonetheless, some waterworks heritage has been preserved within active systems, and some decommissioned sites have successfully been repurposed. All merit closer study by modern planners, engineers, and policymakers as they work to meet water delivery and wastewater removal needs today. In regulatory and political climates where heritage is increasingly threatened, there is a need for management guidelines for historic waterworks infrastructure, in order to consistently apply best practices to analysis, decision making, and modes of treatment. Conservation must be balanced with the demand for new construction and upgrades, in a process that (1) acknowledges significance and identifies character-defining features; (2) evaluates the choice between rehabilitation and replacement for prudence and feasibility; (3) views preservation as a pragmatic and cost-effective means to extend purpose-built service life; (4) replaces sacrificial elements; and (5) repurposes decommissioned elements.

Supporting champions in river management

The importance of relational values in river management: understanding enablers and barriers for effective participation

Bringing river health into being with citizen science: River commons co-learning and practice

A Leverage Points Framework To Manage Changes in River Health

The Smart Rivers approach: Spatial quality in flood protection and floodplain restoration projects based on river DNA

Human–River Relationships

Using an ecosystem services approach to re-frame the management of flow constraints in a major regulated river basin

Community involvement in waterway management: Identifying and prioritising community behaviours to protect and enhance Melbourne's waterways

Silent and Unseen: Stewardship of Water Infrastructural Heritage

Leveraging understandings of biogeomorphic river recovery to reframe river management philosophy and communication strategies

Challenging hydraulic structures of the twenty-first century – from bubbles, transient turbulence to fish passage

Biomic river restoration: A new focus for river management

Truths of the Riverscape: Moving beyond command-and-control to geomorphologically informed nature-based river management

Innovative approaches in river management and restoration

River Chief System As a Collaborative Water Governance Approach in China

When unlocking rivers results in building more infrastructure: A group mental model shares lessons from weir remediation in the United Kingdom

Diverse portfolios: Investing in tributaries for restoration of large river fishes in the Anthropocene

The Rise and Transfer of the River Chief System: A Review of Chinese Water Governance and Its Potential to Transfer to the Global Community

Saving water for the future: Public awareness of water usage and water quality

Community-powered urban stream restoration: A vision for sustainable and resilient urban ecosystems

Ecological restoration of the Los Angeles River provides natural and human benefits as part of a virtuous socioecological cycle