Abstract:Within international and, more specifically, European policy there is a shift towards managing land for multiple benefits and in the public interest. This necessitates greater collaboration between different actors, often with diverging management objectives, across a landscape. Here we present the findings of a qualitative study exploring the influence of social relationships, networks and associated power on land managers’ decision-making, collaborative management and implementation of policy change across a national park in Scotland. We found that social relationships and networks were key in facilitating transformative change in land management but could also consolidate the status quo of land management practices and thus hamper change. Consequently, we observed a polarisation of management practices across the national park shaped by social relationships and networks; with one trend towards an intensification of traditional land use (grouse shooting), and another one towards landscape restoration and nature-based solutions. Top-down collaborative groups, composed of participants with divergent views and perspectives, and designed to promote policy uptake, had not yet improved mutual understanding or social learning. By contrast, voluntary collaboration between like-minded estates strengthened existing views, resulting in polarisation. Poor relationships and distrust between some actors constrained social learning and collaborative decision-making between land managers with diverging interests. However, personal one-to-one relationships, developed over time, between agency staff and land managers could moderate patterns of polarisation, where land managers were amenable and had the capacity to make changes to management. Our research shows that collaborative arrangements may not be the silver bullet for policy uptake or adaptation to change. We instead suggest that a better understanding of where social relationships and trust need to be built would be more effective. Explicit attention should also be placed on the design of collaborative processes to increase the sense of fairness, balance out power dynamics and facilitate social learning.

The importance of relational values in river management: understanding enablers and barriers for effective participation

Interplays between relational and instrumental values: insights from research experiences on human–nature relations

Community values on governing urban water nature-based solutions in Sydney, Australia

For environmental monitors, relationships matter in multiple ways: insights from a research collaboration in South Africa

Social factors and private benefits influence landholders' riverine restoration priorities in tropical Australia

The erosion of relational values resulting from landscape simplification

The role of social network embeddedness and collective efficacy in encouraging farmers' participation in water environmental management

Transforming cross-cultural water research through trust, participation and place

Beyond Biodiversity: Eliciting Diverse Values of Urban Green Spaces in Flanders

Using an ecosystem services approach to re-frame the management of flow constraints in a major regulated river basin

Supporting champions in river management

A cup of tea? – The role of social relationships, networks and learning in land managers’ adaptations to policy change

Community participation: exploring legitimacy in socio-ecological systems for environmental water governance

Fostering collective action through participation in natural resource and environmental management: An integrative and interpretative narrative review using the IAD, NAS and SES frameworks

Community management does not equate to participation: fostering community participation in rural water supplies

Human–River Relationships

Exploring the relationship between plural values of nature, human well‐being, and conservation and development intervention: Why it matters and how to do it?

A Leverage Points Framework To Manage Changes in River Health

Cross-Border Collaboration in River Management: Views on Participation in a Dutch-German Case Study

The Added Value of Understanding Informal Social Networks in an Adaptive Capacity Assessment: Explorations of an Urban Water Management System in Indonesia

Institutional impediments to conservation of freshwater dependent ecosystems