Abstract:Improving power generation of microbial fuel cells (MFCs) requires better methods to quantify the impact of the solution chemistry on performance. While buffer concentration and conductivity have been indicated to impact performance of flat (carbon cloth) anodes, we were able for the first to time to quantitatively determine the impact of the phosphate buffer solution (PBS) concentration separate from conductivity on electrode resistances of commonly used brush anodes and activated carbon cathodes. Using the electrode potential slope (EPS) method, we showed that the anode resistance decreased by 64% (from 14.6 ± 0.1 mΩ m2 to 5.3 ± 0.1 mΩ m2) by increasing the PBS concentration from 50 to 200 mM. There was no appreciable change in the cathode resistance (17.0 ± 0.1 mΩ m2, 50 mM; 18.9 ± 0.2 mΩ m2, 200 mM) although overall performance increased due to a larger cathode experimental working potential (ECat,e0-50 = 268.9 ± 0.9 mV, ECat,e0-200 = 370 ± 1 mV). Adding phosphate buffer to low conductivity synthetic wastewater containing 0.25 g L−1 sodium acetate decreased the anode resistance by 52% (from 59.1 ± 0.2 mΩ m2 to 28.1 ± 0.1 mΩ m2), but increasing only conductivity by adding NaCl or acetate had little impact on electrode resistances. Using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), we determined the reasons for these responses. The cathode was limited by oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) kinetics, while the brush anode was limited by mass transfer (proton diffusion), consistent with the impact of buffer concentration on performance. These results have important implications for operation of MFCs as increasing solution conductivity alone, for example, by adding seawater, will not be sufficient to improve anode performance.

Quantifying the factors limiting performance and rates in microbial fuel cells using the electrode potential slope analysis combined with electrical impedance spectroscopy

Evaluation of Electrode and Solution Area-Based Resistances Enables Quantitative Comparisons of Factors Impacting Microbial Fuel Cell Performance

The Impact of Ohmic Resistance on Measured Electrode Potentials and Maximum Power Production in Microbial Fuel Cells.

Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy studies of the buffered and non‐buffered microbial fuel cell

Improving Phosphate Buffer-Free Cathode Performance of Microbial Fuel Cell Based on Biological Nitrification

Effect of Buffer Charge on Performance of Air-Cathodes Used in Microbial Fuel Cells

Influences of initial pH on performance and anodic microbes of fed-batch microbial fuel cells

Enhanced Performances of Microbial Fuel Cells Using Surface-Modified Carbon Cloth Anodes: A Comparative Study

Performance of a Batch Two‐chambered Microbial Fuel Cell Operated at Different Anode Potentials

Effect of Anolytic Nitrite Concentration on Electricity Generation and Electron Transfer in a Dual-Chamber Microbial Fuel Cell.

Power generation in fed-batch microbial fuel cells as a function of ionic strength, temperature, and reactor configuration.

The Effect of Substrates and Anodes on Microbial Fuel Cell Performance

Anolyte recirculation effects in buffered and unbuffered single-chamber air-cathode microbial fuel cells.

Anode Modification with Capacitive Materials for a Microbial Fuel Cell: an Increase in Transient Power or Stationary Power

Set up of a Microbial Fuel Cell for the Treatment of a Garden Compost Leachate: Impact of the External Polarizing Electric Resistance Upon the Chemical Oxygen Demand Removal

Improving the Performance of Microbial Fuel Cells Through Anode Manipulation

Assessing the Performance of Continuous-Flow Microbial Fuel Cells and Membrane Electrode Assembly with Electrodeposited Mn Oxide Catalyst

Comparison of Different Chemical Treatments of Brush and Flat Carbon Electrodes to Improve Performance of Microbial Fuel Cells

Minimizing mass transfer losses in microbial fuel cells: Theories, progresses and prospectives

Ion Exchange Membrane Cathodes For Scalable Microbial Fuel Cells

Increasing Power Generation for Scaling Up Single-Chamber Air Cathode Microbial Fuel Cells.