Evaluation of Mixing Uniformity for Inline Mixers by Image Processing

Xiang Dai,Youlin Xu,Junyang Chen,Jiaqiang Zheng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.13005
2020-01-01
Transactions of the ASABE
Abstract:Highlights Four inline mixers with different structures are designed and tested for DNIS applications. A new method for evaluating inline mixing uniformity by image processing is presented. While higher carrier flow rates cause better uniformity, changes due to higher mixing ratios are complicated. The multi-injection jet mixer has simplified structure and relatively satisfactory mixing efficacy. Abstract . Effective and specialized mixing devices that can achieve pesticide injection and inline mixing simultaneously are required to achieve better mixing efficacy in direct nozzle injection systems (DNISs), especially when high-viscosity pesticides are used. To evaluate the inline mixing efficacies of four inline mixers with different structures under various application conditions and to propose optimized structures for those inline mixers, a new method for evaluating uniformity based on image processing is presented. The results of experiments show that the proposed method is adequate for determining mixing uniformity. The mixing uniformity of each mixer increased with carrier flow rates (Q) ranging from 800 to 2,000 mL min -1 , but the variations were less significant than those achieved by varying the mixing ratio (P) from 1:100 to 10:100. The mixing uniformity in the jet mixer (mixer A) clearly decreased with an increase in P at different values of Q because the pesticide gradually concentrated on one side of the detection tube. The layered mixer (mixer B) performed better than mixer A, especially at high P. The extension tube installed downstream of mixer B to improve uniformity was shorter than that of mixer A. Mixer C, whose structure was a combination of mixers A and B, had optimal mixing efficacy and the most complicated structure. The uniformity of the multi-injection jet mixer (mixer D) (H average = 12.46) obtained by simplifying mixer C was superior to that of mixers A (H average = 15.35) and B (H average = 14.65) but inferior to that of mixer C (H average = 4.08). With a relatively simple structure, mixer D may generally meet the uniformity requirements, thus resulting in advantages for practical use in DNISs, although further structural optimization of mixer D seems necessary. Keywords: Direct nozzle injection system, Image processing, Inline mixers, Mixing uniformity, Principal component analysis, Various application conditions.
agricultural engineering
What problem does this paper attempt to address?