Discrimination of a ferroelectric from a non-ferroelectric response in PFM by phase analyses at the harmonics of the applied Vac

J. J. Gervacio-Arciniega,E. A. Murillo-Bracamontes,M. Toledo-Solano,J. Fuentes,J. Portelles,E. Cruz-Valeriano,M. A. Palomino-Ovando,J. A. Ramirez-Sarabia,L. Hernandez-Gonzalez,M. P. Cruz
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5142490
IF: 2.877
2020-05-21
Journal of Applied Physics
Abstract:In the last few decades, piezoresponse force microscopy (PFM) has been a valuable tool to analyze ferroelectric materials at nanoscale. Domain switching and phase-hysteresis loops acquired by PFM had been taken as a proof of ferroelectricity; however, these two characteristics have been observed in non-ferroelectric materials, generating uncertainty of the characterizations carried out by PFM. To resolve this problem, strategies have been developed but they are difficult to implement or still fail depending on the measurement conditions. In this work, we provide a simple method to effectively differentiate ferroelectric from non-ferroelectric signals in PFM analyses. It is based on the comparison of the phases of the PFM signals obtained at the first and the second harmonics of the contact resonant frequency of the Vac applied between the tip and the bottom electrode. To illustrate the effectiveness and simplicity of the method, analyses were conducted on a ferroelectric PZT film, a non-ferroelectric glass and SrTiO<sub>3</sub> sample, and a KNN ceramic with ferroelectric and non-ferroelectric zones.
physics, applied
What problem does this paper attempt to address?