Abstract:Abstract Emerging reinforcement learning algorithms that utilize human traits as part of their conceptual architecture have been demonstrated to encourage cooperation in social dilemmas when compared to their unaltered origins. In particular, the addition of a mood mechanism facilitates more cooperative behaviour in multi-agent iterated prisoner dilemma (IPD) games, for both static and dynamic network contexts. Mood-altered agents also exhibit humanlike behavioural trends when environmental aspects of the dilemma are altered, such as the structure of the payoff matrix used. It is possible that other environmental effects from both human and agent-based research will interact with moody structures in previously unstudied ways. As the literature on these interactions is currently small, we seek to expand on previous research by introducing two more environmental dimensions; voluntary interaction in dynamic networks, and stability of interaction through varied network restructuring. From an initial Erdos–Renyi random network, we manipulate the structure of a network IPD according to existing methodology in human-based research, to investigate possible replication of their findings. We also facilitated strategic selection of opponents through the introduction of two partner evaluation mechanisms and tested two selection thresholds for each. We found that even minimally strategic play termination in dynamic networks is enough to enhance cooperation above a static level, though the thresholds for these strategic decisions are critical to desired outcomes. More forgiving thresholds lead to better maintenance of cooperation between kinder strategies than stricter ones, despite overall cooperation levels being relatively low. Additionally, moody reinforcement learning combined with certain play termination decision strategies can mimic trends in human cooperation affected by structural changes to the IPD played on dynamic networks—as can kind and simplistic strategies such as Tit-For-Tat. Implications of this in comparison with human data is discussed, and suggestions for diversification of further testing are made.

When Do Psychopathic Traits Affect Cooperative Behavior?: An Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma Experimental Study

The effect of psychopathy on cooperative strategies in an iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma experiment with emotional feedback

The Dark Triad and framing effects predict selfish behavior in a one-shot Prisoner’s Dilemma

Narcissistic and dependent traits and behavior in four archetypal 2-person, 2-choice games

Social preferences and psychopathy in a sample of male prisoners—a pilot study

The influence of cooperation and defection on social decision making in depression: A study of the iterated Prisoner's Dilemma Game

Dark Triad, Impulsiveness and Honesty-Humility in the Prisoner’s Dilemma Game: The Moderating Role of Gender

Personality and prosocial behavior: A theoretical framework and meta-analysis.

Individualistic attitudes in Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma undermine evolutionary fitness and may drive cooperative human players to extinction

Moral reasoning and moral competence as predictors of cooperative behavior in a social dilemma

Cooperate or aggress? An opponent's tendency to cooperate modulates the neural dynamics of interpersonal cooperation

Neural processing of iterated prisoner’s dilemma outcomes indicates next-round choice and speed to reciprocate cooperation

Predicting Human Cooperation

Assumed similarity in personality traits has a short-lived positive effect on cooperation in absence of reciprocity

To qualify as a social partner, humans hide severe punishment, although their observed cooperativeness is decisive

Are psychotic-like experiences associated with aberrant prosocial decision-making behavior?

‘ I don’t want to play with you anymore ’: dynamic partner judgements in moody reinforcement learners playing the prisoner’s dilemma

Exploring the impact of positive and negative emotions on cooperative behaviour in a Prisoner’s Dilemma Game

Doing good vs. avoiding bad in prosocial choice: A refined test and extension of the morality preference hypothesis

The prisoners may be in two minds

Empathy in One-Shot Prisoner Dilemma