Abstract:Decades of research document individual differences in prosocial behavior using controlled experiments that model social interactions in situations of interdependence. However, theoretical and empirical integration of the vast literature on the predictive validity of personality traits to account for these individual differences is missing. Here, we present a theoretical framework that identifies 4 broad situational affordances across interdependent situations (i.e., exploitation, reciprocity, temporal conflict, and dependence under uncertainty) and more specific subaffordances within certain types of interdependent situations (e.g., possibility to increase equality in outcomes) that can determine when, which, and how personality traits should be expressed in prosocial behavior. To test this framework, we meta-analyzed 770 studies reporting on 3,523 effects of 8 broad and 43 narrow personality traits on prosocial behavior in interdependent situations modeled in 6 commonly studied economic games (Dictator Game, Ultimatum Game, Trust Game, Prisoner's Dilemma, Public Goods Game, and Commons Dilemma). Overall, meta-analytic correlations ranged between -.18 ≤ ρ̂ ≤ .26, and most traits yielding a significant relation to prosocial behavior had conceptual links to the affordances provided in interdependent situations, most prominently the possibility for exploitation. Moreover, for several traits, correlations within games followed the predicted pattern derived from a theoretical analysis of affordances. On the level of traits, we found that narrow and broad traits alike can account for prosocial behavior, informing the bandwidth-fidelity problem. In sum, the meta-analysis provides a theoretical foundation that can guide future research on prosocial behavior and advance our understanding of individual differences in human prosociality. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

The prisoners may be in two minds

An Investigation of N-person Prisoners' Dilemmas

When Do Psychopathic Traits Affect Cooperative Behavior?: An Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma Experimental Study

The Dark Triad and framing effects predict selfish behavior in a one-shot Prisoner’s Dilemma

On the coexistence of cooperators, defectors and conditional cooperators in the multiplayer iterated Prisoner's Dilemma

Action Being Character: A Promising Perspective On The Solution Concept Of Game Theory

To qualify as a social partner, humans hide severe punishment, although their observed cooperativeness is decisive

Dark Triad, Impulsiveness and Honesty-Humility in the Prisoner’s Dilemma Game: The Moderating Role of Gender

The Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma: Good Strategies and Their Dynamics

How much is convenient to defect? A method to estimate the cooperation probability in Prisoner's Dilemma and other games

Balancing selfishness and norm conformity can explain human behavior in large-scale prisoner's dilemma games and can poise human groups near criticality

Cooperation and competition between pair and multi-player social games in spatial populations

Behavioural strategies in simultaneous and alternating prisoner's dilemma games with/without voluntary participation

Individualistic attitudes in Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma undermine evolutionary fitness and may drive cooperative human players to extinction

Social Stratification and Cooperative Behavior in Spatial Prisoners' Dilemma Games

Translucent Players: Explaining Cooperative Behavior in Social Dilemmas

How do reputation and conformity promote cooperation in the prisoner's dilemma?

Personality and prosocial behavior: A theoretical framework and meta-analysis.

Time and the Prisoner's Dilemma

Conditional cooperation and confusion in public-goods experiments

A solution concept for games with altruism and cooperation