Abstract:Decades of research document individual differences in prosocial behavior using controlled experiments that model social interactions in situations of interdependence. However, theoretical and empirical integration of the vast literature on the predictive validity of personality traits to account for these individual differences is missing. Here, we present a theoretical framework that identifies 4 broad situational affordances across interdependent situations (i.e., exploitation, reciprocity, temporal conflict, and dependence under uncertainty) and more specific subaffordances within certain types of interdependent situations (e.g., possibility to increase equality in outcomes) that can determine when, which, and how personality traits should be expressed in prosocial behavior. To test this framework, we meta-analyzed 770 studies reporting on 3,523 effects of 8 broad and 43 narrow personality traits on prosocial behavior in interdependent situations modeled in 6 commonly studied economic games (Dictator Game, Ultimatum Game, Trust Game, Prisoner's Dilemma, Public Goods Game, and Commons Dilemma). Overall, meta-analytic correlations ranged between -.18 ≤ ρ̂ ≤ .26, and most traits yielding a significant relation to prosocial behavior had conceptual links to the affordances provided in interdependent situations, most prominently the possibility for exploitation. Moreover, for several traits, correlations within games followed the predicted pattern derived from a theoretical analysis of affordances. On the level of traits, we found that narrow and broad traits alike can account for prosocial behavior, informing the bandwidth-fidelity problem. In sum, the meta-analysis provides a theoretical foundation that can guide future research on prosocial behavior and advance our understanding of individual differences in human prosociality. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Assumed similarity in personality traits has a short-lived positive effect on cooperation in absence of reciprocity

Differences in Cooperation Between Social Dilemmas of Gain and Loss

Self-interested learning is more important than fair-minded conditional cooperation in public-goods games

Cooperative Behavior in the Ultimatum Game and Prisoner's Dilemma Depends on Players' Contributions.

When Do Psychopathic Traits Affect Cooperative Behavior?: An Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma Experimental Study

Explaining Cooperative Behavior in Public Goods Games: How Preferences and Beliefs Affect Contribution Levels

Long-term evidence on cooperation and cultural differences in public goods dilemmas

Does Revealing Personality Data Affect Prosocial Behavior?

The effect of psychopathy on cooperative strategies in an iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma experiment with emotional feedback

Selfish learning is more important than fair-minded conditional cooperation in public-goods games

When is altruistic punishment useful in social dilemmas?

Cooperation without punishment

Asymmetric effects of social and economic incentives on cooperation in real effort based public goods games

Exploring the impact of positive and negative emotions on cooperative behaviour in a Prisoner’s Dilemma Game

Benevolent characteristics promote cooperative behaviour among humans

Personality and prosocial behavior: A theoretical framework and meta-analysis.

To qualify as a social partner, humans hide severe punishment, although their observed cooperativeness is decisive

A solution concept for games with altruism and cooperation

Heritability of decisions and outcomes of public goods games

Group Competition and Personality in an Experimental Public Goods Game

Increasing benefits in one-time public goods does not promote cooperation