Abstract:The results of this study show that the airless pump packaging system had least environmental burden than other packaging options for all life cycle impact categories. The packaging material production phase and the lotion residue are the primary contributors to all impact categories except ozone depletion. Practitioners need to implement packaging designs that leave minimum residue to reduce the overall system's environmental impact. Worldwide, the packaging industry for consumer product goods, including personal care and beauty products, generates over $25 billion in sales. An extremely high environmental impact follows the large demand in the industry. Almost 70% of the plastic waste generated in the cosmetics market is not recyclable. Sustainability in the beauty industry is complex and multifaceted, requiring an evaluation of all factors. Packaging plays an important role in the cosmetics market, and considering the amount of waste it generates, it is essential to understand packaging dispensing systems from an environmental perspective. This study investigated the environmental impacts of three dispensing systems commonly used for cosmetic product packaging: the general dip‐tube pump, the airless pump and the bag‐in‐bottle format. A cradle‐to‐grave life cycle assessment (LCA) was performed to quantitatively analyse the environmental burden of those three different dispensing systems, using a facial cream as a test case. The LCA analysed the environmental impacts generated by the packaging materials and incorporated the environmental impacts created by the facial cream residue left behind in each dispensing system. The system boundary of this LCA included the material production, intermediate processes, distribution, use and end‐of‐life phases of the packaged facial cream products. The LCA complied with the ISO standards, 14,040:2006 and 14,044:2006, and LCA software SimaPro v 9.0 was used to analyse the results. The life cycle inventories used in this LCA included US‐EI 2.2, USLCI and Ecoinvent 3. TRACI 2.1, including ten mid‐point life cycle impact categories, was chosen as the life cycle impact analysis method. Comparative and contribution analyses were conducted to interpret the LCA data. The comparative analysis demonstrated that the airless pump packaging system had less environmental burden than the other two packaging systems for all the life cycle impact categories. The bag‐in‐bottle alternative had the highest environmental impact for eight of the ten impact categories. The contribution analysis results revealed that the packaging material production phase most contributed to the environmental burden of all three packaging formats, followed by the lotion residue.

Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Multiple Liquid Laundry Detergent Packaging Formats

Life cycle assessment of multiple dispensing systems used for cosmetic product packaging

Life Cycle Assessment of Beverage Packaging

Biodegradable packaging life-cycle assessment

Meta-Analysis of Life Cycle Assessment Studies for Polyethylene Terephthalate Water Bottle System

Systematic packaging design tools integrating functional and environmental consequences on product life cycle: Case studies on laundry detergent and milk

Life cycle environmental impacts of consumer packaging products in Japan

The Cradle-to-Cradle Life Cycle Assessment of Polyethylene terephthalate: Environmental Perspective

Environmental Impacts of End-of-Life Options of Biobased and Fossil-Based Polyethylene Terephthalate and High-Density Polyethylene Packaging

A complete life cycle assessment of high density polyethylene plastic bottle

Plastic Versus Bioplastic as Packaging for Sanitary Products: The Environmental Impacts Comparison

Life cycle assessment (LCA) of PET and PLA bottles for the packaging of fresh pasteurised milk: The role of the manufacturing process and the disposal scenario

Environmental Impact Assessment of Low-Density Polyethylene and Polyethylene Terephthalate Containers Using a Life Cycle Assessment Technique

Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Two Different Packaging Systems for Extra-Virgin Olive Oil: Glass Bottle vs. 100% Recycled Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Bottle

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Eco-Profile of Plastic, Glass, and Aluminium Bottles

Application of life cycle assessment in the packaging sector for the environmental assessment of polymer and biopolymer based materials: A review

Sustainable Design Strategy of Cosmetic Packaging in China Based on Life Cycle Assessment

Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Two Types of Flexible Plastic Packaging under a Sustainable Circular Economy Approach

Comparative Eco-Profiles of Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) and Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA) Using Life Cycle Assessment

Environmental impacts of functional fillers in polylactide (PLA)-based bottles using life cycle assessment methodology

The impact of detergent performance on sustainable consumer laundry behavior; a socio-technical challenge