Abstract:Abstract Purpose A circular (bio)economy is sustained through use of secondary raw material and biomass feedstock. In life cycle assessment (LCA), the approach applied to address the impact of these feedstocks is often unclear, in respect to both handling of the recycled content and End-of-Life recyclability and disposal. Further, the modelling approach adopted to account for land use change (LUC) and biogenic C effects is crucial to defining the impact of biobased commodities on global warming. Method We depart from state-of-the-art approaches proposed in literature and apply them to the case of non-biodegradable plastic products manufactured from alternative feedstock, focusing on selected polymers that can be made entirely from secondary raw material or biomass. We focus on global warming and the differences incurred by recycled content, recyclability, LUC, and carbon dynamics (effects of delayed emission of fossil C and temporary storage of biogenic C). To address the recycled content and recyclability, three formulas recently proposed are compared and discussed. Temporary storage of biogenic C is handled applying methods for dynamic accounting. LUC impacts are addressed by applying and comparing a biophysical, global equilibrium and a normative-based approach. These methods are applied to two case studies (rigid plastic for packaging and automotive applications) involving eight polymers. Results and discussion Drawing upon the results, secondary raw material is the feedstock with the lowest global warming impact overall. The results for biobased polymers, while promising in some cases (polybutylene succinate), are significantly affected by the formulas proposed to handle the recycled content and recyclability. We observe that some of the proposed formulas in their current form do not fully capture the effects associated with the biogenic nature of the material when this undergoes recycling and substitutes fossil materials. Furthermore, the way in which the recycled content is modelled is important for wastes already in-use. LUC factors derived with models providing a combined direct and indirect impact contribute with 15–30% of the overall life cycle impact, which in magnitude is comparable to the savings from temporary storage of biogenic C, when included. Conclusion End-of-Life formulas can be improved by addition of corrective terms accounting for the relative difference in disposal impacts between the recycled and market-substituted product. This affects the assessment of biobased materials. Inclusion of LUCs effects using economic/biophysical models in addition to (direct) LUC already embedded in commercial datasets may result in double-counting and should be done carefully. Dynamic assessment allows for detailed modelling of the carbon cycle, providing useful insights into the impact associated with biogenic C storage.

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Eco-Profile of Plastic, Glass, and Aluminium Bottles

Life Cycle Assessment of Beverage Packaging

Meta-Analysis of Life Cycle Assessment Studies for Polyethylene Terephthalate Water Bottle System

Life cycle assessment (LCA) of PET and PLA bottles for the packaging of fresh pasteurised milk: The role of the manufacturing process and the disposal scenario

Application of LCA Method for Assessment of Environmental Impacts of a Polylactide (PLA) Bottle Shaping

Comparison of life cycle assessment for wooden pallet and different plastic pallets based on SimaPro

How does plastic compare with alternative materials in the packaging sector? A systematic review of LCA studies

Environmental impacts of functional fillers in polylactide (PLA)-based bottles using life cycle assessment methodology

The Cradle-to-Cradle Life Cycle Assessment of Polyethylene terephthalate: Environmental Perspective

Life cycle assessment of beverage bottles

Life cycle assessment of reusable plastic food packaging

A complete life cycle assessment of high density polyethylene plastic bottle

Life Cycle Assessment of End-of-life Treatments for Plastic Film Waste

Life Cycle Assessment Model of Plastic Products: Comparing Environmental Impacts for Different Scenarios in the Production Stage

Comparing two types of mainstream disposable lunch boxes by LCA and exploring the possibility of converting carbon dioxide into products

Comparison of life cycle assessment for laminating and glazing processes based on simapro

Life cycle environmental impacts of consumer packaging products in Japan

Carbon footprint of plastic from biomass and recycled feedstock: methodological insights

Environmental Impacts of End-of-Life Options of Biobased and Fossil-Based Polyethylene Terephthalate and High-Density Polyethylene Packaging

Recommendations for Life-Cycle Assessment of Recyclable Plastics in a Circular Economy

Lifecycle Management for Sustainable Plastics: Recent Progress from Synthesis, Processing to Upcycling