Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate whether corporate social responsibility (CSR) can lower tax risk. Previous studies have demonstrated a negative link between CSR and tax aggressiveness. Generally, corporations engaging in social irresponsibility tend to undertake aggressive tax planning; whereas socially responsible firms enjoy tax savings. Because several recent studies have suggested that lower tax payments do not necessarily create higher tax risk, an exploration of the relationship between CSR and tax risk was not only interesting but also important. Design/methodology/approach Using an ethical perspective of CSR, this paper argues that executives who are nourished by an ethical climate tend to make responsible and reliable operating decisions. Therefore, their corporations would have better control of tax administration, and the corresponding tax risk would be constrained. Such corporations would enjoy greater tax savings while keeping their tax risk at relatively low levels. However, this reasoning ignores the fact that limited economic resources would constrain a firm from practicing CSR in the form of donations. This situation would also influence its attitude toward tax strategies. Specifically, when a firm’s performance is unsatisfactory, the cultural effect of CSR may diminish or even disappear. Findings Firms donating additional resources to CSR activities can construct a more ethical work climate that encourages executives to control tax risk while lowering tax expenses. For firms with unsatisfactory performance, the ethical benefits of CSR could disappear, thus suggesting a relationship with firm performance. This finding contributes to the knowledge on the ethical implications of CSR and proposes that the culture argument is conditional on satisfactory firm performance. Originality/value This study explores the association between corporate culture (CSR) and tax risk. The empirical results help shareholders, analysts and other investors to make their business decision better because CSR or corporate culture is less likely to change suddenly or dramatically in an abbreviated time. The finding of this study shed light on the importance of corporate culture on making an investment evaluation or decision. In addition, this study extends the research on CSR by demonstrating that the effects of CSR are conditioned on firm performance. The beneficial effect of CSR on tax risk would disappear when firms have unfavorable financial performance.

Board Risk Oversight and Corporate Tax-Planning Practices

Tax Risk Management and Board Responsibility

Tempering Financial Reporting Risk through Board Risk Management

The Shareholder Response to Corporate Tax Planning Advice Regulation

Are required SEC proxy disclosures about the board’s role in risk oversight substantive?

External Auditor Responses to Tax Risk

Board Risk Oversight and Environmental and Social Responsibility

Taxation and Corporate Risk-Taking

Corporate social responsibility, firm performance and tax risk

Corporate governance, incentives, and tax avoidance

Enterprise risk management and corporate tax planning

Do corporate governance characteristics influence tax management?

PCAOB Inspections, Knowledge Diffusion, and Corporate Tax Planning Effectiveness

Revisiting corporate governance and financial risk‐taking

Political Risk and Corporate Tax Behavior: Firm-Level Evidence

Board Diversity, Firm Risk, and Corporate Policies

The nexus between standalone risk committees and tax aggressiveness: evidence from Nigeria

Corporate governance structure and capital adequacy: implications to bank risk taking

Corporate governance and risk-taking in New Zealand

Tax Aggressiveness and Corporate Transparency

Assessing Tax Risk: Practitioner Perspectives