Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate whether corporate social responsibility (CSR) can lower tax risk. Previous studies have demonstrated a negative link between CSR and tax aggressiveness. Generally, corporations engaging in social irresponsibility tend to undertake aggressive tax planning; whereas socially responsible firms enjoy tax savings. Because several recent studies have suggested that lower tax payments do not necessarily create higher tax risk, an exploration of the relationship between CSR and tax risk was not only interesting but also important. Design/methodology/approach Using an ethical perspective of CSR, this paper argues that executives who are nourished by an ethical climate tend to make responsible and reliable operating decisions. Therefore, their corporations would have better control of tax administration, and the corresponding tax risk would be constrained. Such corporations would enjoy greater tax savings while keeping their tax risk at relatively low levels. However, this reasoning ignores the fact that limited economic resources would constrain a firm from practicing CSR in the form of donations. This situation would also influence its attitude toward tax strategies. Specifically, when a firm’s performance is unsatisfactory, the cultural effect of CSR may diminish or even disappear. Findings Firms donating additional resources to CSR activities can construct a more ethical work climate that encourages executives to control tax risk while lowering tax expenses. For firms with unsatisfactory performance, the ethical benefits of CSR could disappear, thus suggesting a relationship with firm performance. This finding contributes to the knowledge on the ethical implications of CSR and proposes that the culture argument is conditional on satisfactory firm performance. Originality/value This study explores the association between corporate culture (CSR) and tax risk. The empirical results help shareholders, analysts and other investors to make their business decision better because CSR or corporate culture is less likely to change suddenly or dramatically in an abbreviated time. The finding of this study shed light on the importance of corporate culture on making an investment evaluation or decision. In addition, this study extends the research on CSR by demonstrating that the effects of CSR are conditioned on firm performance. The beneficial effect of CSR on tax risk would disappear when firms have unfavorable financial performance.

Tax Risk Management and Board Responsibility

Board Risk Oversight and Corporate Tax-Planning Practices

Acceptable levels of tax risk as a metric of corporate tax responsibility: theory, and a survey of practice

Denmark: Tax Risk Management

The Shareholder Response to Corporate Tax Planning Advice Regulation

Do corporate governance characteristics influence tax management?

Corporate social responsibility, firm performance and tax risk

Taxation and Corporate Risk-Taking

Reconciling risk as threat and opportunity: The social construction of risk in boardrooms

Corporate governance, incentives, and tax avoidance

The Curious Case of Corporate Tax Avoidance: Is it Socially Irresponsible?

Corporate tax risk: a literature review and future research directions

Risk Management Triggers: From the Tax Risk Pitfalls to Organizational Risk

Tax Aggressiveness, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Ownership Structure

Tempering Financial Reporting Risk through Board Risk Management

External Auditor Responses to Tax Risk

Corporate Tax Planning: Strategies for Troubled Times, Again

The nexus between standalone risk committees and tax aggressiveness: evidence from Nigeria

Responsible Tax in Multinational Enterprises – Why and How? (Ansvarlig Skat I Multinationale Koncerner – Hvorfor Og Hvordan?)

The Scope of the Business Judgment Rule and its Relation to the Fiduciary Duties of Company Directors

Tax strategy control: The case of transfer pricing tax risk management