Abstract:Purpose This paper explores how the disclosure quality, measured by the abnormal tone of environmental and social report, may determine the environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) performance of the firm. This study also investigates the impact of the moderator “board of directors” to explore the extent to which a well-balanced board of directors may affect this association within an impression management strategy. Design/methodology/approach This work uses a sample of 616 firm-year observations using a sample of French firms indexed on SBF120 index from 2010 to 2017. To test the developed hypotheses, the GLS regression is applied and to control for endogeneity issue and sample selection bias, the authors used, respectively, the two stage least square (2SLS) procedure and the Heckman model. Findings Findings suggest that a well-balanced board of directors moderates the relationship between the ESG performance and the disclosure quality. The positive effect of abnormal tone management on ESG is weakened by the presence of a good structure of the board, attenuating impression management initiatives. Research limitations/implications The research provides evidence of the impact of corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting quality, in particular disclosure tone management, on the level of ESG performance in the French context. As the board of directors may have a major impact on weakening impression management strategies in particular tone management practices, in order to improve CSR report quality, the authors recommend French companies to ensure a well-balanced board of directors. Originality/value This study helps investors to comprehensively evaluate the information disclosed on CSR reports. It unveils that a strong board composition induces better quality of CSR report and brings better ESG performance. Thus, the study results point to the importance of a well-balanced board of directors and the regulation of the narrative disclosure of CSR information.

Board Risk Oversight and Environmental and Social Responsibility

Environmental Performance and Corporate Risk-Taking: Evidence from China

Board oversight: Required ESG for public companies in Europe

Embedding sustainability in risk management: The impact of environmental, social, and governance ratings on corporate financial risk

Environmental, Social and Governance Performance: Analysis of CEO Power and Corporate Risk

The impact of corporate environmental disclosure practices and board attributes on sustainability: Empirical evidence from Asia and Europe

The Effect of Board Characteristics on Firm Environmental Performance

Tempering Financial Reporting Risk through Board Risk Management

Risk governance for environmental, social, and governance investing and activities

The Importance of Board Risk Oversight in Times of Crisis

Can Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility Reduce Firms’ Idiosyncratic Risk? Evidence From China

Board Risk Oversight and Corporate Tax-Planning Practices

Board Long-Term Orientation, Earnings Management, Disclosure and Risk

Does environmental, social, and governance performance affect financial risk disclosure? Evidence from European ESG companies

THE ROLE OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS ON ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE DISCLOSURE (ESG): EVIDENCE FROM EMERGING MARKETS

CEO Power and ESG Performance: The Mediating Role of Managerial Risk-Taking

How Media Coverage of Corporate Social Irresponsibility Increases Financial Risk

ESG performance and disclosure quality: does a well-balanced board of directors matter when impression management occurs?

A Study on the Impact of Board Characteristics on the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Responsibilities of Listed Companies—Evidence from Chinese Listings

The impact of corporate governance on sustainability performance