Abstract:Stigmatized topics, such as HIV/STD, likely constrain related information sharing in ways that should be apparent in social interactions both on and off the Internet. Specifically, the authors predicted that the more people perceive an issue as stigmatized, the less likely they are to talk about the issue both privately (with sexual partners and peers) and publicly (on Twitter). Study 1 tested the effect of stigma on conversations at the individual level: The authors asked a group of participants (N = 138) about perceived STD-testing stigma, interactions with a sexual partner, and conversations with peers about STD testing. Study 2 assessed whether health conditions, in the aggregate, were less likely to generate social media activity as a function of current stigmatization. Using 259,758 archived Twitter posts mentioning 13 medical conditions, the authors tested whether level of stigma predicted the volume of relevant social media conversation, controlling for each condition's amount of advocacy and Google search popularity from a user's perspective. Findings supported our hypotheses. Individuals who reported perceiving a given health conditions in more stigmatic ways also reported interacting less with others about that topic; Twitter results showed a similar pattern. Results also suggest a more complex story of influence, as funding from the National Institutes of Health (i.e., each conditions amount of advocacy) associated with the examined health conditions also predicted Twitter activity. Overall, these results indicated that stigma had a similar, dampening effect on face-to-face and Twitter interactions. Findings hold theoretical and practical implications, which are discussed.

Digital destigmatization: How exposure to networking profiles can reduce social stereotypes

How does contact valence and group salience affect outgroup attitudes in asynchronous computer mediated contact? Experiments on intergroup contact via social media posts

When is computer-mediated intergroup contact most promising? Examining the effect of out-group members' anonymity on prejudice

Does Digital Intergroup Contact Reduce Prejudice? A Meta-Analysis

Does outgroup media exposure reduce prejudice in real life? Testing mediated contact effects with media diets in South Africa

Stigma's Effect on Social Interaction and Social Media Activity

Catch 22: The Paradox of Social Media Affordances and Stigmatized Online Support Groups

Bridging the gap on Facebook: assessing intergroup contact and its effects for intergroup relations

Intergroup contact through online comments: Effects of direct and extended contact on outgroup attitudes

Virtually meeting "The Intouchables": Online contact, sense of community, and prejudice toward people with a disability

Meeting of minds: Narratives as a tool to reduce prejudice toward stigmatized group members

How Self-Disclosure in Online Postings Affects Female Readers’ Stigmatisation Towards Mothers with a Disability

Does attitude importance moderate the effects of person-first language? A registered report

Exploring the De-Stigmatizing Effect of Social Media on Homosexuality in China: an Interpersonal-Mediated Contact Versus Parasocial-Mediated Contact Perspective

Parasocial Relationship and Reduction of Intergroup Prejudice against the Chinese LGBT Community: Intergroup Anxiety and Direct Contact

Bridging Segregation Via Media Exposure? Ingroup Identification, Outgroup Distance, and Low Direct Contact Reduce Outgroup Appearance in Media Repertoires

Social Contact: Next Steps in an Effective Strategy to Mitigate the Stigma of Mental Illness

Exploring the interaction between negative and positive intergroup contact among disabled people

Interpersonal contact and the stigma of mental illness: A review of the literature

Browsing Different Instagram Profiles and Associations With Psychological Well-Being

Transition, Connection, Disconnection, and Social Media: Examining the Digital Lived Experiences of Transgender Individuals