Abstract:Seventy years of research on intergroup contact, or face-to-face interactions between members of opposing social groups, demonstrates that positive contact typically reduces prejudice and increases social cohesion. Extant syntheses, however, have not considered the full breadth of contact valence (positive/negative) and have treated self-selection as a threat to validity. This research bridges intergroup contact theory with sequential sampling models of impression formation to assess contact effects across all valences. From the premise that positive versus negative contact instigates differential resampling of outgroup experiences when self-selection is possible, we advance and meta-analytically test new predictions for the moderation of valenced contact effects and negativity bias as a function of people's opportunity and motivation to self-select in and out of contact. Our random-effects synthesis of positive and negative intergroup contact studies (238 independent samples, 936 nested effects; total N = 152,985) found significant valenced contact effects: Positive contact systematically associates with lower prejudice, and negative contact associates with higher prejudice. Critically, the detrimental effect of negative contact is significantly larger than the benefit of positive contact. This negativity bias is particularly pronounced under conditions in which one can self-select, is motivated to avoid contact, among male-dominated and prejudiced samples, in contact with stigmatized, low status, low socioeconomic status outgroups, along nonconcealable stigma, with nonintimate contact partners in informal settings and in collectivistic societies. Considering individuals' motivation and opportunity to self-select, together with contact valence, therefore offers a more nuanced and integrated platform to design contact-based interventions and policies across varied contact ecologies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)

Bridging the gap on Facebook: assessing intergroup contact and its effects for intergroup relations

Reducing prejudice via direct and extended cross-group friendship

Intergroup Contact Theory: Past, Present, and Future

Beyond direct contact: The theoretical and societal relevance of indirect contact for improving intergroup relations

When the direct route is blocked: The extended contact pathway to improving intergroup relations

Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? A longitudinal test of the contact hypothesis among majority and minority groups in three european countries.

Does outgroup media exposure reduce prejudice in real life? Testing mediated contact effects with media diets in South Africa

Digital destigmatization: How exposure to networking profiles can reduce social stereotypes

Improving intergroup relations with extended and vicarious forms of indirect contact

Intergroup contact in context: The mediating role of social norms and group-based perceptions on the contact–prejudice link

How does contact valence and group salience affect outgroup attitudes in asynchronous computer mediated contact? Experiments on intergroup contact via social media posts

Does Digital Intergroup Contact Reduce Prejudice? A Meta-Analysis

The Longitudinal Relationship Between Youth Intergroup Contact and Social Cohesion Outcomes in Two Divided Societies

When is computer-mediated intergroup contact most promising? Examining the effect of out-group members' anonymity on prejudice

Intergroup contact is reliably associated with reduced prejudice, even in the face of group threat and discrimination.

The Longitudinal Effects of Intergroup Contact on Youth Attitudes Towards Ethnic Minorities and Constructive Societal Engagement

Negativity bias in intergroup contact: Meta-analytical evidence that bad is stronger than good, especially when people have the opportunity and motivation to opt out of contact.

Improving intergroup relations through direct, extended and other forms of indirect contact

Reducing explicit and implicit outgroup prejudice via direct and extended contact: The mediating role of self-disclosure and intergroup anxiety.

Need satisfaction in intergroup contact: A multinational study of pathways toward social change.

Bridging Segregation Via Media Exposure? Ingroup Identification, Outgroup Distance, and Low Direct Contact Reduce Outgroup Appearance in Media Repertoires