Abstract:Seventy years of research on intergroup contact, or face-to-face interactions between members of opposing social groups, demonstrates that positive contact typically reduces prejudice and increases social cohesion. Extant syntheses, however, have not considered the full breadth of contact valence (positive/negative) and have treated self-selection as a threat to validity. This research bridges intergroup contact theory with sequential sampling models of impression formation to assess contact effects across all valences. From the premise that positive versus negative contact instigates differential resampling of outgroup experiences when self-selection is possible, we advance and meta-analytically test new predictions for the moderation of valenced contact effects and negativity bias as a function of people's opportunity and motivation to self-select in and out of contact. Our random-effects synthesis of positive and negative intergroup contact studies (238 independent samples, 936 nested effects; total N = 152,985) found significant valenced contact effects: Positive contact systematically associates with lower prejudice, and negative contact associates with higher prejudice. Critically, the detrimental effect of negative contact is significantly larger than the benefit of positive contact. This negativity bias is particularly pronounced under conditions in which one can self-select, is motivated to avoid contact, among male-dominated and prejudiced samples, in contact with stigmatized, low status, low socioeconomic status outgroups, along nonconcealable stigma, with nonintimate contact partners in informal settings and in collectivistic societies. Considering individuals' motivation and opportunity to self-select, together with contact valence, therefore offers a more nuanced and integrated platform to design contact-based interventions and policies across varied contact ecologies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)

Exploring the interaction between negative and positive intergroup contact among disabled people

Negativity bias in intergroup contact: Meta-analytical evidence that bad is stronger than good, especially when people have the opportunity and motivation to opt out of contact.

Positive and negative intergroup contact: Evidence of their interactions in a child sample

When contact goes wrong: Negative intergroup contact promotes generalized outgroup avoidance

Intergroup contact is reliably associated with reduced prejudice, even in the face of group threat and discrimination.

Improving intergroup relations with extended and vicarious forms of indirect contact

Advancing E-contact to Reduce Intergroup Anxiety and Increase Positive Attitudes Towards Individuals Who Identify as Bisexual

Improving intergroup relations through direct, extended and other forms of indirect contact

Beyond direct contact: The theoretical and societal relevance of indirect contact for improving intergroup relations

Improving intergroup relation through humanization: The moderating role of negative direct contact and the mediating role of intergroup affect

The dynamics of interminority extended contact: The role of affective and cognitive mediators.

Virtually meeting "The Intouchables": Online contact, sense of community, and prejudice toward people with a disability

Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? A longitudinal test of the contact hypothesis among majority and minority groups in three european countries.

Effects of intergroup contact on explicit and implicit outgroup attitudes: A longitudinal field study with majority and minority group members

The benefit of contact for prejudice-prone individuals: The type of stigmatized outgroup matters

Reaching across social divides deliberately: Theoretical, political, and practical implications of intergroup contact volition for intergroup relations

When the direct route is blocked: The extended contact pathway to improving intergroup relations

Specific emotions as mediators of the effect of intergroup contact on prejudice: findings across multiple participant and target groups

Does Digital Intergroup Contact Reduce Prejudice? A Meta-Analysis

How does contact valence and group salience affect outgroup attitudes in asynchronous computer mediated contact? Experiments on intergroup contact via social media posts

Digital destigmatization: How exposure to networking profiles can reduce social stereotypes