Abstract:The analysis of morphology is crucial to the study of phylogeny in many ancient and modern organismal groups. Recently a number of arguments have been made in favor of regarding certain kinds of morphometric variables as putatively homologous characters and allowing them to participate, along with other non-morphometric variables, in parsimony-based cladistic analyses. These arguments rest on the assumptions that geometric landmarks incorporate the concept of biological homology and that partial warp and principal warp morphometric variables uniquely incorporate and operationalize the concept of spatial localization, thus providing investigators with the ability to assess patterns and directions of geometrical variation in unmeasured regions of organic forms. Literature review, coupled with empirical investigations of similarities and differences among three different morphometric data analysis methods on two different datasets suggest that there is no support for these assertions. Geometric landmarks, which form the basis for all morphometric measurements and latent shape variables, have no necessary correspondence to biological homology. Partial warp variables, coordinate-point eigenshape variables, and inter-landmark distance-based singular vector shape-change variables all express localized (= regionally-weighted) geometric deformations. However, none of these deformation patterns are localized in the sense of being truly independent from globally-distributed aspects of shape change. All three of the morphometric data analysis methods investigated are capable of inferring patterns of shape change in remote regions of the form so long as a spatially adequate array of landmarks is used as the basis for the shape analysis. Based on these results it is concluded that: (1) all types of morphometric procedures are potentially useful in phylogenetic inference to the extent that they are able to summarize patterns of biotic shape change within the Euclidean space of the original measurements; (2) morphometric interpretations are strengthened by using alternative analytic approaches to probe the geometric system in a hypothetico-deductive manner and achieve a robust and consistent interpretation of underlying differences among operational taxonomic units (OTU s); and (3) while deformation- based morphometric variables can be used to analyze the distribution of organic shapes in a variety of measurement and latent variable spaces, they represent abstract investigative tools that are tied irreducibly to particular samples and data. Such variables can be used to study morphological characters, refine character and character state definitions, and aid in the assignment of character states to OTU s. However, they are not characters themselves and may not be suitable for phylogenetic analyses directly. In addition, a new morphometric data analysis technique coordinate-point eigenshape analysis is described and its use illustrated.

Evaluating the effects of parallax in archaeological geometric morphometric analyses

The quantitative assessment of archaeological artifact groups: Beyond geometric morphometrics

Some Applications of Geometric Morphometrics to Archaeology

The promise of geometric morphometrics

Inter- and intra-observer variation in phytolith morphometry

Thirty years of geometric morphometrics: Achievements, challenges, and the ongoing quest for biological meaningfulness

Measurement error in geometric morphometrics

LANDMARKS, LOCALIZATION AND THE USE OF MORPHOMETRICS IN PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS

Sample Size and Geometric Morphometrics Methodology Impact the Evaluation of Morphological Variation

The third dimension of stone points: 2D vs. 3D geometric morphometric shape analysis

Archaeophenomics of ancient domestic plants and animals using geometric morphometrics : a review

Practical and technical aspects for the 3D scanning of lithic artefacts using micro-computed tomography techniques and laser light scanners for subsequent geometric morphometric analysis. Introducing the StyroStone protocol

Can morphotaxa be assessed with photographs? Estimating the accuracy of two‐dimensional cranial geometric morphometrics for the study of threatened populations of African monkeys

The Virtual Goniometer: A new method for measuring angles on 3D models of fragmentary bone and lithics

Obtaining new resolutions in carnivore tooth pit morphological analyses: A methodological update for digital taphonomy

Virtual anthropology? Reliability of three-dimensional photogrammetry as a forensic anthropology measurement and documentation technique

Pitfalls of Computed Tomography 3D Reconstruction Models in Cranial Nonmetric Analysis*

Technical note: Capturing shape-Linear measurements and geometric morphometrics of the immature femora

Geometric morphometrics and geological shape-classification systems

Effects of different segmentation methods on geometric morphometric data collection from primate skulls

Paleoimaging: a review of applications and challenges