Comparison of Methodologies for Craniofacial Soft-tissue Cephalometrics: The Value of Virtual Reality
Akriti Choudhary (A.C.),John Vandevender (J.V.),Kevin Yang (K.Y.),Sobhi Kazmouz (S.K.),Michael Edgar (M.E.),Marina Lentskevich (M.L.),Christopher Juarez (C.J.),Julius Mendoza (J.M.),Kyle Bartelt (K.B.),Alvin Nguyen (A.N.),Chad A Purnell (C.A.P.)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2024.02.035
IF: 3.022
2024-02-11
Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
Abstract:Background Myriad options are available for plastic surgeons to perform soft-tissue analysis, which is vital to perioperative evaluation and research. Our objective is to compare the accuracy, precision, and efficiency of available cephalometric modalities in conducting facial soft-tissue measurements. Methods Twenty soft-tissue facial measurements were performed by 5 measurers of varying experiences on 5 adult subjects, using 6 methods– manual calipers, CBCT, virtual reality (VR), 3D stereophotogrammetry, iPad-based 3D photogrammetry, and 2-dimensional photographs. Measurement sessions were timed and performed in triplicate, for a total of 9000 measurements. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated for accuracy and one-way ANOVA was used for comparison. The coefficient of variation (CoV) was compared among groups to evaluate the precision of different methods, considering caliper measurements the gold standard. Results ICC among raters was 0.932, indicating excellent reliability. VR was significantly faster than other methods (137 seconds vs 217 seconds for caliper, p<0.001 ). CoV was highest for 2D photographs and lowest for VR (11.0 vs 6.4, p<0.001 ). The CoV of the caliper was similar to other methods, except for 2D photography, which was significantly higher. Measurements with the greatest absolute difference from caliper measurements, across modalities, were those around the eyes (left to right exocanthion), tragion to antitragion, and tragion to exocanthion. Conclusion 2D photography is not an accurate method for cephalometric measurements. VR has the lowest variation between measurements, is the fastest, and is equivalent to caliper measurements in accuracy. For studies involving a large number of cephalometrics, VR measurements may be a good option to improve study throughput.
surgery