Abstract:Problem definition: This paper studies an entrepreneur’s pricing strategy in a reward-based crowdfunding campaign under asymmetric product quality information. We propose two signaling mechanisms and investigate how entrepreneurs can leverage their pricing strategy to signal a high-quality project. Academic/practical relevance: This problem is relevant to practice, as asymmetric quality information is a significant concern in reward-based crowdfunding. High-quality entrepreneurs seek credible mechanisms to signal the quality of projects to customers. Methodology: We develop a stylized game-theoretic signaling model with funding and regular selling periods that captures asymmetric quality information between an entrepreneur and customers. Results: We propose a new theory on quality signaling in crowdfunding. We show that contingent access to the regular selling market after running a successful crowdfunding campaign allows high-quality entrepreneurs to signal their quality through low funding prices (one-price signaling). A high-quality entrepreneur can increase his funding price and still signal his high-quality level if he commits to the future regular selling price (two-price signaling). We show that the distinct feature of crowdfunding, that is, the probabilistic nature of crowdfunding, plays different roles in one- and two-price signaling. It is the driving force for the separating equilibrium in one-price signaling, and in two-price signaling, it affects how the entrepreneur should manipulate his funding and regular selling prices to reduce signaling cost. Managerial implications: Entrepreneurs should be mindful of pricing in funding and regular selling periods because it could play an essential role in signaling quality information. Our findings suggest practical tools for quality signaling in crowdfunding. We also investigate when price commitment is the most beneficial for a high-quality entrepreneur, looking for potential signaling mechanisms. Funding: W. Zhou acknowledges financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant 72192823 and Grant 71821002]. Supplemental Material: The online appendices are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.1177 .

Signaling Product Quality Through Prices in an Oligopoly Model With Costly Consumer Search

Analysis of firm's pricing strategy with online reviews based on signaling game model

Signaling Quality by Warranty and Price in a Duopoly Market

Strategic Pricing under Quality Signaling and Imitation Behaviors in Supply Chains

Competitive pricing despite search costs if lower price signals quality

Listing Prices As Signals of Quality in Markets with Negotiation

Postsearch Uncertainty, Product Heterogeneity, and Price Divergence

Signaling Product Quality Information In Supply Chains Via Corporate Social Responsibility Choices

Quality Signaling under External Information

The Quality-Signaling Role of Manipulated Consumer Reviews

Price Signaling and Channel Coordination

Consumer Search with Imperfect Vertical-quality Information

Experience Goods and Consumer Search

Attraction versus Persuasion: Information Provision in Search Markets

Attraction Via Prices and Information

Quality Signaling Through Crowdfunding Pricing

Signalling Service Quality through Price and Certifications

Does better information lead to lower prices ? Price and Advertising Signaling under External Information about Product Quality

The Signaling Game Model under Asymmetric Fairness-Concern Information.

Consumer Heterogeneity and Pricing Strategies:A Quality-Price Competition Model

A price competitive model of oligopoly insurance market with different service quality