Abstract:The translation of Chymiaphilosophica by Jakub Barner is the second publication in Polish historiography of a printed source work on early modem chemistry (alchemy) written by a Polish citizen, well known and influencial across Europe (the first such translation comprised the treatises of Michael Sendivogius). This admirable initiative of unquestionable value to Polish historians of science resulted in an elegantly published volume, with an extensive introduction and useful appendices. The language of the translation is pleasant to read, retaining the spirit of the original by means of a moderate use of archaisms and generally accurate selection of proper terminology. A closer comparison of some fragments of the translation reveals, however, that it omits essential words, phrases and even entire sentences. The translation itself is occasionally incorrect as well, completely changing the meaning of the author's text and distorting his intentions, thereby undermining the reliability of the Polish translation as a whole. In the factual layer, identifying both chemical substances and (especially) the names of the authors cited by Barner often appear to be doubtful or problematic. Apart from numerous obvious mistakes, as well as leaving many surnames unidentified even when it was very difficult, the translators and/or editors of the Polish text created some non-existent authors as a result of errors produced while copying their surnames from the original text or due to unfounded assumptions that some chemical or botanical terms are names of chemical authors. There is also no consistency in the spelling of surnames (usually left in the Latin form, sometimes spelled with wrong inflection, but also modernised). In the biographical introduction there are also numerous factual errors and some bizarre mistranslations. Not only did its author fail to correct invalid information of earlier biographers of Barner, relying only on the most obvious and accessible publications, but also perpetuated these "historiographical myths" and even created new ones. Neither did he consult any sources apart from some other of Barners published books. Writing from the positivist perspective and on the basis of outdated literature, he also sustained the categorical distinction between alchemy and chemistry, already rejected in contemporary historiography, thus presenting the role and position of Barner in the history of science not quite adequately. If one adds to that the very numerous "typos" throughout the book, it may be regarded as a negative example of poor source editing in almost every respect, even though it makes a pleasant reading.

The beginnings of chemistry: from ancient times until 1661

Chemistry, Medicine, and Gold-Making: Tycho Brahe, Helwig Dieterich, Otto Tachenius, and Johann Glauber

Thinking about Chemistry in Byzantium and the Islamic World

Medicine, Life, and Transformations of Matter

The Transition from Alchemical to Modern Chemical Symbolism: from Bergman and Guiton de Morveau to Hassenfratz and Adet, Higgins, Richter, Dalton, and Berzelius

The History of the Phlogiston Theory

Chemical Developments and Our Daily Life

A History of Chemistry in Japan, 1820-1955

From alchemy to personalised medicine: the journey of laboratory medicine

Chemistry in 17th-Century New England

Boyle, Glauber, and Newton: The Redintegration Experiment with Saltpeter

Founding the First Chemistry Laboratory in Russia: Mikhail Lomonosov's Project

Alchemy, Chinese versus Greek, an etymological approach: a rejoinder

A Brief History of the Development of Chromatography and Its Enlightenment to Us

Medical Performance and the Alchemy of Plants in the Ventures of Leonhard Thurneisser zum Thurn

Johan August Strindberg – Chemist

Daniel Sennert, Chymistry, and Theological Debates

Development of Theoretical Chemistry in China

Chemistry 2.0: Developing a New, Solvent-Free System of Chemical Synthesis Based on Mechanochemistry

Chemical Synthesis and Materials Discovery

[Jakub Barner (1640-1683) and his Chymia philosophica (1698): side notes on the publication of the Polish translation]