Abstract:Previous papers at TPRC and elsewhere have contributed to our understanding of the significance of automated, data-driven decision systems, especially when used for regulation. The objective of this research is to analyse two specific and interrelated developments in order to ascertain the extent to which they call for the development of new types of model and new approaches to algorithmic regulation. The first of these is ‘fintech’ - in particular the consolidation and transfer of investment decisions from human to algorithmic control and the migration of financial intermediation, payment services and data curation beyond traditionally regulated financial entities. The second is regtech – automated and real-time provision of compliance-related information to regulators. Both pose challenges: practical, legal and ethical difficulties in auditing and assurance; moving beyond individual reporting entities to systems as units of analysis and control; maintaining the efficiency and efficacy of contracts, markets and regulatory obligations; and ensuring that the resulting system is as low-cost and flexible as possible (but not more so). These difficulties are not just pragmatic; recent work on data ethics highlights the difficulty of detecting and correcting incorrect decisions (let alone dealing with their indirect and systemic impacts) and the inevitable fragmentation of responsibility among those officially responsible, technology players, programmers, data sources, etc. The research draws on a set of cases to include (at least) digital wealth managers and automated spectrum use reporting and trading. The ‘red thread’ is the extent to which algorithms can usefully be considered as more than just faster and more consistent was of implementing decision rules. Four alternatives are considered: i) the impact of interactions among algorithms and the persistence and manipulability of the ‘histories’ on which they operate (in other words, the difference between source code and running instances); ii) application of principal-agent analysis to entities that are imperfectly auditable, act on the basis of imperfectly observable information and/or can only be controlled be rules that operate at the ‘speed of information’ (slower or faster than the algorithm itself); iii) modelling algorithms as links in a network (connecting people, data, and institutions) using the tools of network game theory; and iv) an evolutionary approach which views algorithm types as ‘species’ whose populations interact in a market ecosystem. The first three alternatives apply existing theoretical methods to stylised versions of the cases; the fourth uses simulations based on exemplary decision rules (moving averages, CAPM/OPM, Kalman filters and Bollinger band strategies) and different regulatory options. An interesting outcome is the possibility that continuous reporting can enable new types of dynamic regulation that are less burdensome and more effective than today’s static alternatives.

Model Talk: Calculative Cultures in Quantitative Finance

Rethinking calculation: the popularization of financial trading outside the global centres of finance

A Novel Approach to Quantification of Model Risk for Practitioners

Statistical Modeling: The Three Cultures

Risk management and calculative cultures

Breiman's two cultures: You don't have to choose sides

Comment on "Statistical Modeling: The Two Cultures" by Leo Breiman

Model Risk Analysis via Investment Structuring

Electrodynamical model of quasi-efficient financial market

Data science's cultural construction: qualitative ideas for quantitative work

Adding to the Regulator's Toolbox: Integration and Extension of Two Leading Market Models

The absorption and multiplication of uncertainty in machine‐learning‐driven finance

Get with the Program: Fintech Meets Regtech in the Light-Touch Sandbox

Quant 4.0: Engineering Quantitative Investment with Automated, Explainable and Knowledge-driven Artificial Intelligence

Interpretability in Safety-Critical FinancialTrading Systems

“Big Data” Analysis: Putting the Data Cart Before the Modelling Horse?

Machine Learning for Quantitative Finance Applications: A Survey

Modeling Decision-Making Under Uncertainty with Qualitative Outcomes

Modeling, dependence, classification, united statistical science, many cultures

Developing Predictive Models for Financial Stability: Integrating Behavioral Analytics into Credit Risk Management

Big data applications with theoretical models and social media in financial management