Modeling Decision-Making Under Uncertainty with Qualitative Outcomes

Nachshon Korem,Or Duek,Rounan Jia,Emily Wertheimer,Sierra Metviner,Michael Grubb,Ifat Levy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.27.609831

2024-08-28

Abstract:Modeling decision-making under uncertainty typically relies on quantitative outcomes. Many decisions, however, are qualitative in nature, posing problems for traditional models. Here, we aimed to model uncertainty attitudes in decisions with qualitative outcomes. Participants made choices between certain outcomes and the chance for more favorable outcomes in quantitative (monetary) and qualitative (medical) modalities. Using computational modeling, we estimated the values participants assigned to qualitative outcomes and compared uncertainty attitudes across domains. Our model provided a good fit for the data, including quantitative estimates for qualitative outcomes. The model outperformed a utility function in quantitative decisions. Additionally, we found an association between ambiguity attitudes across domains. Results were replicated in an independent sample. We demonstrate the ability to extract quantitative measures from qualitative outcomes, leading to better estimation of subjective values. This allows for the characterization of individual behavior traits under a wide range of conditions.

Neuroscience

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### Problems the Paper Attempts to Solve

The paper aims to address the issue of how to model qualitative outcomes when making decisions under conditions of uncertainty. Traditional decision models typically rely on quantitative outcomes, but in many real-world decisions, the outcomes are often qualitative, such as the results in medical choices. These qualitative outcomes are difficult to measure numerically, leading to limitations in traditional models when dealing with such decisions.

Specifically, the goals of the paper include:
1. **Quantifying the Value of Qualitative Outcomes**: Estimating the subjective value participants assign to qualitative outcomes (such as different treatment effects in medical decisions) through computational models.
2. **Evaluating the Model's Fit**: Applying the model to data with quantitative outcomes (such as monetary decisions) to verify its fit and compare it with existing classical utility models.
3. **Exploring the Correlation of Uncertainty Attitudes in Different Domains**: Investigating whether participants' attitudes towards uncertainty in different decision scenarios (such as monetary and medical decisions) are correlated.

Through these objectives, the paper hopes to provide a method to convert qualitative outcomes into quantifiable values, thereby better understanding and predicting human decision-making behavior in complex situations. This not only helps improve the description of individual behavioral characteristics but also offers new perspectives for studying the decision-making process.