Abstract:In recent years collaborative robots have become major market drivers in industry 5.0, which aims to incorporate them alongside humans in a wide array of settings ranging from welding to rehabilitation. Improving human-machine collaboration entails using computational algorithms that will save processing as well as communication cost. In this study we have constructed an agent that can choose when to cooperate using an optimal strategy. The agent was designed to operate in the context of divergent interest tacit coordination games in which communication between the players is not possible and the payoff is not symmetric. The agent's model was based on a behavioral model that can predict the probability of a player converging on prominent solutions with salient features (e.g., focal points) based on the player's Social Value Orientation (SVO) and the specific game features. The SVO theory pertains to the preferences of decision makers when allocating joint resources between themselves and another player in the context of behavioral game theory. The agent selected stochastically between one of two possible policies, a greedy or a cooperative policy, based on the probability of a player to converge on a focal point. The distribution of the number of points obtained by the autonomous agent incorporating the SVO in the model was better than the results obtained by the human players who played against each other (i.e., the distribution associated with the agent had a higher mean value). Moreover, the distribution of points gained by the agent was better than any of the separate strategies the agent could choose from, namely, always choosing a greedy or a focal point solution. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt to construct an intelligent agent that maximizes its utility by incorporating the belief system of the player in the context of tacit bargaining. This reward-maximizing strategy selection process based on the SVO can also be potentially applied in other human-machine contexts, including multiagent systems.

The Effect of Loss-Aversion on Strategic Behaviour of Players in Divergent Interest Tacit Coordination Games

Differences in Cooperation Between Social Dilemmas of Gain and Loss

Loss aversion fosters coordination among independent reinforcement learners

Using a Stochastic Agent Model to Optimize Performance in Divergent Interest Tacit Coordination Games

Collectivism-individualism: Strategic behavior in tacit coordination games

Expectations-Based Loss Aversion May Help Explain Seemingly Dominated Choices in Strategy-Proof Mechanisms

A Model of Risk and Mental State Shifts during Social Interaction

The Neural Dynamics of Loss Aversion

Activation of the DLPFC Reveals an Asymmetric Effect in Risky Decision Making: Evidence from a Tdcs Study

Prosocial Gains and Losses: Modulations of Human Social Decision-Making by Loss-Gain Context

The role of loss aversion in social conformity: psychological and neural representations

Expectations-based Loss Aversion in Contests

Evolutionary Dynamics of Networked Multi-Person Games: Mixing Opponent-Aware and Opponent-Independent Strategy Decisions

Against the proportionality principle: Experimental findings on bargaining over losses

Effects of conservative-militant defection strategies on the evolution of cooperation in social dilemma

The differential impact of friendship on cooperative and competitive coordination

The influence of aggressive behavior on cooperation evolution in social dilemma

Research on Loss Aversion and Its Formation in Prospect Theory

Tacit Coordination in Games with Third-Party Externalities

Average abundancy of cooperation in multi-player games with random payoffs

Risk aversion can promote cooperation