Abstract:Cooperation in social dilemmas plays a pivotal role in the formation of systems at all levels of complexity, from replicating molecules to multi-cellular organisms to human and animal societies. In spite of its ubiquity, the origin and stability of cooperation pose an evolutionary conundrum, since cooperation, though beneficial to others, is costly to the individual cooperator. Thus natural selection would be expected to favor selfish behavior in which individuals reap the benefits of cooperation without bearing the costs of cooperating themselves. Many proximate mechanisms have been proposed to account for the origin and maintenance of cooperation, including kin selection, direct reciprocity, indirect reciprocity, and evolution in structured populations. Despite the apparent diversity of these approaches they all share a unified underlying logic: namely, each mechanism results in assortative interactions in which individuals using the same strategy interact with a higher probability than they would at random. Here we study the evolution of cooperation in both discrete strategy and continuous strategy social dilemmas with assortative interactions. For the sake of tractability, assortativity is modeled by an individual interacting with another of the same type with probability r and interacting with a random individual in the population with probability 1−r, where r is a parameter that characterizes the degree of assortativity in the system. For discrete strategy social dilemmas we use both a generalization of replicator dynamics and individual-based simulations to elucidate the donation, snowdrift, and sculling games with assortative interactions, and determine the analogs of Hamilton’s rule, which govern the evolution of cooperation in these games. For continuous strategy social dilemmas we employ both a generalization of deterministic adaptive dynamics and individual-based simulations to study the donation, snowdrift, and tragedy of the commons games, and determine the effect of assortativity on the emergence and stability of cooperation.

The influence of aggressive behavior on cooperation evolution in social dilemma

Differences in Cooperation Between Social Dilemmas of Gain and Loss

Cooperation and Charity in Spatial Public Goods Game under Different Strategy Update Rules

Effects of conservative-militant defection strategies on the evolution of cooperation in social dilemma

Effects of three-faced strategy on the evolution of cooperation in social dilemma

The influence of quasi-cooperative strategy on social dilemma evolution

Advanced defensive cooperators promote cooperation in the prisoner’s dilemma game

Effects of quasi-defection strategy on cooperation evolution in social dilemma

The implications of deep cooperation strategy for the evolution of cooperation in social dilemmas

The Evolution of Cooperation and Reward in a Corrupt Environment

Evolution of conditional cooperation in collective-risk social dilemma with repeated group interactions

Effects of Reciprocal Rewarding on the Evolution of Cooperation in Voluntary Social Dilemmas

Effects of exposure-based reward and punishment on the evolution of cooperation in prisoner’s dilemma game

Evolution of Cooperation in a Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Structured Population

Evolution of cooperation with the diversity of cooperation tendencies

Emergence of cooperation in spatial social dilemmas with expulsion

Cooperate or aggress? An opponent's tendency to cooperate modulates the neural dynamics of interpersonal cooperation

Wisdom of groups promotes cooperation in evolutionary social dilemmas

Suppressing defection by increasing temptation: the impact of smart cooperators on a social dilemma situation

Evolution of Cooperation in Social Dilemmas with Assortative Interactions

Extortion Provides Alternative Routes to the Evolution of Cooperation in Structured Populations