Practical Clinical Implementation of the Special Physics Consultation Process in the Re-irradiation Environment

Robert A. Price,Lihui Jin,Joshua Meyer,Lili Chen,Teh Lin,Ahmed Eldib,Xiaoming Chen,Jie Liu,Iavor Veltchev,Lu Wang,Charlie Ma
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2020.09.027
2021-01-01
Advances in Radiation Oncology
Abstract:PurposeThe purpose of this work is to present a practical, structured process allowing consistent, safe radiotherapy delivery in the re-treatment environment.Methods and MaterialsA process is described for re-irradiation with documentation in the form of a special physics consultation. Data acquisition associated with previous treatment is described from highest to lowest quality. Methods are presented for conversion to equieffective dose and our departmental assumptions for tissue repair. Generation of OAR available physical dose for use in treatment planning is discussed. A comparison of results using our methods is made with published values following conversion to biologically effective dose (BED). Utilization of pulsed-low-dose-rate (PLDR) delivery is described. Data for re-irradiation using these methods over the previous 5 years are presented.ResultsThe period between 2015 through 2019, has seen the number of patients in our department requiring equieffictive dose calculation double. We have developed guidelines for estimation of sublethal damage repair as a function of time between treatment courses ranging from 0% for <6 months to 50% for >1 year. These guidelines were developed based on available spinal cord data as we found that 84% of OARs involved nerve-like tissues. The average percent repair used increased from 32 to 37% over this time period. When comparing results found using our methods with published values, 99% of patient's cumulative BED were below limits established for acceptable myelopathy rates. PLDR use over this period tripled with the average prescription dose being 49Gy.ConclusionsThe methods described result in safe, effective treatment in the re-irradiation setting. Further correlation with patient outcome and side effects is warranted.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?