Abstract:The prevalence of osteoporotic fracture is high due to global aging problem. Delayed and impaired healing in osteoporotic fractures increase the socioeconomic burden significantly. Through intensive animal and clinical research in recent years, the pathogenesis of osteoporotic fracture healing is unveiled, including decreased inflammatory response, reduced mesenchymal stem cells and deteriorated angiogenesis, etc. The enhancement of osteoporotic fracture healing is important in shortening hospitalization, thus reducing related complications. Mechanical stimulation is currently the most well-accepted approach for rehabilitation of osteoporotic fracture patients. Some new interventions providing mechanical signals were explored extensively in recent years, including vibration treatment, and osteoporotic fracture healing was found to respond very well to these signals. Vibration treatment could accelerate osteoporotic fracture healing with improved callus formation, mineralization and remodeling. However, the mechanism of how osteoporotic fracture bones sense mechanical signals and relay to bone formation remains unanswered. Osteocytes are the most abundant cells in bone tissues. Cumulative evidence confirm that osteocyte is a type of mechanosensory cell and shows altered morphology and reduced cell density during aging. Meanwhile, osteocytes serve as endocrine cells to regulate bone and mineral homeostasis. However, the contribution of osteocytes in osteoporotic fracture healing is largely unknown. A recent in vivo study was conducted to examine the morphological and functional changes of osteocytes after vibration treatment in an osteoporotic metaphyseal fracture rat model. The findings demonstrated that vibration treatment induced significant outgrowth of canaliculi and altered expression of various proteins (E11, DMP1, FGF23 and sclerostin), particularly osteocyte-specific dentin matrix protein 1 (DMP1) which was greatly increased. DMP1 may play a major role in relaying mechanical signals to bone formation, which may require further experiments to consolidate. Most importantly, vibration treatment significantly increased the mineralization and accelerated the osteoporotic fracture healing in metaphyseal fracture model. In summary, osteocyte is the major cell type to sense mechanical signals and facilitate downstream healing in osteoporotic fracture bone. Vibration treatment has good potential to be translated for clinical application to benefit osteoporotic fracture patients, while randomized controlled trials are required to validate its efficacy.

Influence of Low-Magnitude High-Frequency Vibration on Bone Cells and Bone Regeneration

Involvement of Wnt activation in the micromechanical vibration-enhanced osteogenic response of osteoblasts

Osteogenic Differentiation of Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells on Bone-Derived Scaffolds: Effect of Microvibration and Role of ERK1/2 Activation.

Low magnitude high frequency vibration promotes chondrogenic differentiation of bone marrow stem cells with involvement of β-catenin signaling pathway.

Low magnitude high frequency vibration promotes chondrogenic differentiation of bone marrow stem cells with involvement of -catenin signaling pathway

Whole Body Vibration Improves Osseointegration by Up-Regulating Osteoblastic Activity but Down-Regulating Osteoblast-Mediated Osteoclastogenesis Via ERK1/2 Pathway.

Influence of Different Intensities of Vibration on Proliferation and Differentiation of Human Periodontal Ligament Stem Cells

Effects of low-magnitude high-frequency vibration on osteoblasts are dependent on estrogen receptor α signaling and cytoskeletal remodeling

Effects of mechanical vibration on proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of human periodontal ligament stem cells.

Direct Radial LMHF Microvibration Induced Bone Formation and Promoted Implant Osseointegration.

Can we enhance osteoporotic metaphyseal fracture healing through enhancing ultrastructural and functional changes of osteocytes in cortical bone with low‐magnitude high‐frequency vibration?

Effects of Whole-Body Low-Magnitude High-Frequency Vibration on Endochondral Bone Formation during Fracture Healing

Does Low-Magnitude High-Frequency Vibration (LMHFV) Worth for Clinical Trial on Dental Implant? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Animal Studies

Vibration loading promotes osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells via p38 MAPK signaling pathway.

Microvibration Stimulates Β-Catenin Expression and Promotes Osteogenic Differentiation in Osteoblasts.

Low-magnitude high-frequency vibration treatment augments fracture healing in ovariectomy-induced osteoporotic bone.

Estrogen Receptor α Signaling in Osteoblasts is Required for Mechanotransduction in Bone Fracture Healing

Enhancement of osteoporotic fracture healing by vibration treatment: The role of osteocytes

Low Magnitude High Frequency Vibration Promotes Adipogenic Differentiation of Bone Marrow Stem Cells Via P38 MAPK Signal.

Whole Body Vibration with Rest Days Could Improve Bone Quality of Distal Femoral Metaphysis by Regulating Trabecular Arrangement.

Effects of mechanical vibration on bone – a critical review