Abstract:Problem: Development of a novel, competency-based program of assessment requires creation of a plan to measure the processes that enable successful implementation. The principles of implementation science outline the importance of considering key drivers that support and sustain transformative change within an educational program. The introduction of Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) as a framework for assessment has underscored the need to create a structured plan to prepare assessors to engage in a new paradigm of assessment. Although approaches to rater training for workplace-based assessments have been described, specific strategies to prepare assessors to apply standards related to the level of supervision a student needs have not been documented. Intervention: We describe our systematic approach to prepare assessors, faculty and postgraduate trainees, to complete EPA assessments for medical students during the clerkship phase of our curriculum. This institution-wide program is designed to build assessors' skills in direct observation of learners during authentic patient encounters. Assessors apply new knowledge and practice skills in using established performance expectations to determine the level of supervision a learner needs to perform clinical tasks. Assessors also learn to provide feedback and narrative comments to coach students and promote their ongoing clinical development. Data visualizations for assessors facilitate reinforcement of the tenets learned during training. Collaborative learning and peer feedback during faculty development sessions promote the formation of a community of practice among assessors. Context: Faculty development for assessors was implemented in advance of implementation of the EPA program. Assessors in the program include residents/fellows who work closely with students, faculty with discipline-specific expertise and a group of experienced clinicians who were selected to serve as experts in competency-based EPA assessments, the Master Assessors. Training focused on creating a shared understanding about the application of criteria used to evaluate student performance. EPA assessments based on the AAMC's Core Entrustable Professional Activities for Entering Residency, were completed in nine core clerkships. EPA assessments included a supervision rating based on a modified scale for use in undergraduate medical education. Impact: Data from EPA assessments completed during the first year of the program were analyzed to evaluate the effectiveness of the faculty development activities implemented to prepare assessors to consistently apply standards for assessment. A systematic approach to training and attention to critical drivers that enabled institution-wide implementation, led to consistency in the supervision rating for students' first EPA assessment completed by any type of assessor, ratings by assessors done within a specific clinical context, and ratings assigned by a group of specific assessors across clinical settings. Lessons learned: A systematic approach to faculty development with a willingness to be flexible and reach potential participants using existing infrastructure, can facilitate assessors' engagement in a new culture of assessment. Interaction among participants during training sessions not only promotes learning but also contributes to community building. A leadership group responsible to oversee faculty development can ensure that the needs of stakeholders are addressed and that a change in assessment culture is sustained.

Where the rubber meets the road — An integrative review of programmatic assessment in health care professions education

Ottawa 2020 consensus statements for programmatic assessment - 2. Implementation and practice

"It Changed How I Think"-Impact of Programmatic Assessment Upon Practicing Physicians: A Qualitative Study

Design and Implementation of a National Program of Assessment Model – Integrating Entrustable Professional Activity Assessments in Canadian Specialist Postgraduate Medical Education

Combining Support and Assessment in Health Professions Education: Mentors' and Mentees' Experiences in a Programmatic Assessment Context

Assessment Practices in Continuing Professional Development Activities in Health Professions: A Scoping Review

Validity evidence for programmatic assessment in competency-based education

Assessment of interprofessional competence in undergraduate health professions education: protocol for a systematic review of self-report instruments

Leveraging Narrative Feedback in Programmatic Assessment: The Potential of Automated Text Analysis to Support Coaching and Decision-Making in Programmatic Assessment

Implementing Systematic Faculty Development to Support an EPA-Based Program of Assessment: Strategies, Outcomes, and Lessons Learned

Responding to the real problem of sustainable resuscitation skills with real assessment. Mixed‐methods evaluation of an authentic assessment programme

Internal evaluation of medical programs is more than housework: A scoping review

Making judgments based on reported observations of trainee performance: a scoping review in Health Professions Education

Evaluating a Competency-Based Blended Health Professions Education Program: A Programmatic Approach

Tools for self- or peer-assessment of interprofessional competencies of healthcare students: a scoping review

Reforming Medical Physics and Radiopharmaceutical Science Training Through a Programmatic Approach to Assessment

A Scoping Review of Assessment Methods Following Undergraduate Clinical Placements in Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine

Clinical assessor's experiences of assessing undergraduate nursing and midwifery students who underperform on clinical placement: A qualitative systematic review and meta-summary

The Balancing Act of Assessment Validity in Interprofessional Healthcare Education: A Qualitative Evaluation Study

Assessment and remediation for physicians with suspected performance problems: an international survey

Characterising programme‐level assessment environments that support learning