Abstract:Phenomenon: Professionalism is integral to the role of the physician. Most professionalism assessments in medical training are delayed until clinical rotations where multisource feedback is available. This leaves a gap in student assessment portfolios and potentially delays professional development. Approach: A total of 246 second-year medical students (2013-2015) completed self- and peer assessments of professional behaviors in 2 courses following a series of Team-Based Learning exercises. Correlation and regression analyses were used to examine the alignment or misalignment in the relationship between the 2 types of assessments. Four subgroups were formed based on observed patterns of initial self- and peer assessment alignment or misalignment, and subgroup membership stability over time was assessed. A missing data analysis examined differences between average peer assessment scores as a function of selective nonparticipation. Findings: Spearman correlation demonstrated moderate to strong correlation between self-assessments completed alone (no simultaneous peer assessment) and self-assessments completed at the time of peer assessments ( = .59, p < .0001) but weak correlation between the two self-assessments and peer assessments (alone: = .13, p < .013; at time of peer: = .21, p < .0001). Generalized estimating equation models revealed that self-assessments done alone (p < .0001) were a significant predictor of self-assessments done at the time of peer. Course was also a significant predictor (p = .01) of self-assessment scores done at the time of peer. Peer assessment score was not a significant predictor. Bhapkar's test revealed subgroup membership based on the relationship between self- and peer ratings was relatively stable across Time 1 and Time 2 assessments ((2) = 0.83, p = .84) for all but one subgroup; members of the subgroup with initially high self-assessment and low peer assessment were significantly more likely to move to a new classification at the second measurement. A missing data analysis revealed that students who completed all self-assessments had significantly higher average peer assessment ratings compared to students who completed one or no self-assessments with a difference of -0.32, 95% confidence interval [-0.48, -0.15]. Insights: Multiple measurements of simultaneous self- and peer assessment identified a subgroup of students who consistently rated themselves higher on professionalism attributes relative to the low ratings given by their peers. This subgroup of preclinical students, along with those who elected to not complete self-assessments, may be at risk for professionalism concerns. Use of this multisource feedback tool to measure perceptual stability of professionalism behaviors is a new approach that may assist with early identification of at-risk students during preclinical years.

Tools for self- or peer-assessment of interprofessional competencies of healthcare students: a scoping review

Assessment of interprofessional competence in undergraduate health professions education: protocol for a systematic review of self-report instruments

Peer assessment of professional competence

Social and healthcare students' competence in patient-oriented care enhanced during interprofessional practice: A scoping review

Assessing Healthcare Simulation Facilitation

From individual to interprofessional: characteristics of assessment tasks to assess interprofessional collaboration in healthcare education

Self-directed learning and the student learning experience in undergraduate clinical science programs: a scoping review

Collaboration cognizance: Development of a self-assessment tool to measure intra-professional collaborative practices (IPCP) in postgraduate medical residents at tertiary care hospitals

Preceptors' views of assessing nursing students using a competency based approach

Development and validation of a new self-assessment tool to measure professionalism among medical students

Development and validation of an assessment tool for higher education learning abroad programs: A qualitative Delphi study

A Novel Approach to Assessing Professionalism in Preclinical Medical Students Using Multisource Feedback Through Paired Self- and Peer Evaluations

Assessment Tools for Patient Notes in Medical Education: A Scoping Review

A psychometric evaluation of inter-professional education competency tool in nursing and medicine students

A systematic scoping review and content analysis of organizational health literacy responsiveness assessment tools

Peer teacher training for health professional students: a systematic review of formal programs

Introducing an assessment tool based on a full set of end-of-training EPAs to capture the workplace performance of final-year medical students

Assessing professional identity formation (PIF) amongst medical students in Oncology and Palliative Medicine postings: a SEBA guided scoping review

Assessment of medical students’ integrated clinical communication skills: development of a tailor-made assessment tool

Design and pilot implementation of an evaluation tool assessing professionalism, communication and collaboration during a unique global health elective

Dual use of instruments for assessing nursing students professional- and clinical competence