Abstract:After the recent double revolutions in structural biology, which include the use of direct detectors for cryo‐electron microscopy resulting in a significant improvement in the expected resolution of large macromolecule structures, and the advent of AlphaFold which allows for near‐accurate prediction of any protein structures, the field of structural biology is now pursuing more ambitious targets, including several MDa assemblies. But complex target systems cannot be tackled using a single biophysical technique. The field of integrative structural biology has emerged as a global solution. The aim is to integrate data from multiple complementary techniques to produce a final three‐dimensional model that cannot be obtained from any single technique. The absence of atomic force microscopy data from integrative structural biology platforms is not necessarily due to its nm resolution, as opposed to Å resolution for x‐ray crystallography, nuclear magnetic resonance, or electron microscopy. Rather a significant issue was that the AFM topographic data lacked interpretability. Fortunately, with the introduction of the AFM‐Assembly pipeline and other similar tools, it is now possible to integrate AFM topographic data into integrative modeling platforms. The advantages of single molecule techniques, such as AFM, include the ability to confirm experimentally any assembled molecular models or to produce alternative conformations that mimic the inherent flexibility of large proteins or complexes. The review begins with a brief overview of the historical developments of AFM data in structural biology, followed by an examination of the strengths and limitations of AFM imaging, which have hindered its integration into modern modeling platforms. This review discusses the correction and improvement of AFM topographic images, as well as the principles behind the AFM‐Assembly pipeline. It also presents and discusses a series of challenges that need to be addressed in order to improve the incorporation of AFM data into integrative modeling platform.

Simulation atomic force microscopy for atomic reconstruction of biomolecular structures from resolution-limited experimental images

Three-dimensional Reconstruction of Individual Helical Nano-Filament Structures from Atomic Force Microscopy Topographs.

Finite Element Modelling of Atomic Force Microscopy Imaging on Deformable Surfaces

Chapter 5 Structural Biology with Cryo-AFMs and Computational Modeling

Automated Structure Discovery in Atomic Force Microscopy

Perspectives Toward an Integrative Structural Biology Pipeline With Atomic Force Microscopy Topographic Images

Atomic Force Microscopy Simulations for CO-functionalized tips with Deep Learning

Atomic Force Microscopy in Structural Biology: from the Subcellular to the Submolecular.

Atomic force microscopy 3D structural reconstruction of individual particles in the study of amyloid protein assemblies

HSAFM-MIREBA - Methodology for Inferring REsolution in biological applications

AFMfit : Deciphering conformational dynamics in AFM data using fast nonlinear NMA and FFT-based search

A Novel Atomic Force Microscope with High Stability and Scan Speed

Reducing Molecular Simulation Time for AFM Images Based on Super-Resolution Methods

The mechanism of high-resolution STM/AFM imaging with functionalized tips

viAFM - a Python toolset for virtual Atomic Force Microscopy

High-resolution imaging and nano-manipulation of biological structures on surface.

Automated Force Volume Image Processing for Biological Samples

Trace_y: Software Algorithms for Structural Analysis of Individual Helical Filaments by Three-Dimensional Contact Point Reconstruction Atomic Force Microscopy

Scanning probe microscopy of nucleic acids and thin organic films

Imaging of atomic orbitals with the Atomic Force Microscope - experiments and simulations

Unraveling Low-Resolution Structural Data Of Large Biomolecules By Constructing Atomic Models With Experiment-Targeted Parallel Cascade Selection Simulations