Greater than 3-Log Reduction in Viable Coronavirus Aerosol Concentration in Ducted Ultraviolet-C (UV–C) Systems

Yuechen Qiao,My Yang,Ian A. Marabella,Devin A. J. McGee,Hamada Aboubakr,Sagar Goyal,Christopher J. Hogan,Bernard A. Olson,Montserrat Torremorell,Christopher J. Hogan Jr
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c05763
2020-12-02
Abstract:Control technologies to inactivate airborne viruses effectively are needed during the ongoing SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, and to guard against airborne transmitted diseases. We demonstrate that sealed UV–C flow reactors operating with fluences near 253 ± 1 nm of 13.9–49.6 mJ cm<sup>–2</sup> efficiently inactivate coronaviruses in an aerosol. For measurements, porcine respiratory coronavirus (PRCV) was nebulized in a custom-built, 3.86 m wind tunnel housed in a biosafety level class II facility. The single pass log<sub>10</sub> reduction of active coronavirus was in excess of 2.2 at a flow rate of 2439 L min<sup>–1</sup> (13.9 mJ cm<sup>–2</sup>) and in excess of 3.7 (99.98% removal efficiency) at 684 L min<sup>–1</sup> (49.6 mJ cm<sup>–2</sup>). Because virus titers resulting from sampling downstream of the UV–C reactor were below the limit of detection, the true log reduction is likely even higher than measured. Comparison of virus titration results to reverse transcriptase quantitative PCR and measurement of fluorescein concentrations (doped into the nebulized aerosol) reveals that the reduction in viable PRCV is primarily due to UV–C based inactivation, as opposed to physical collection of virus. The results confirm that UV–C flow reactors can efficiently inactivate coronaviruses through incorporation into HVAC ducts or recirculating air purifiers.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acs.est.0c05763?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.0c05763</a>.Table S1. Oligonucleotides for PRCV RT-qPCR used in this study. Figure S1. The size distribution functions for the DMEM solution nebulized by number (a) and by volume (b). Results are based on combined measurements from an SMPS and APS. Particles are assumed spherical with unit density in APS data interpretation. Standard Deviation of the Log Reduction (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acs.est.0c05763/suppl_file/es0c05763_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.
environmental sciences,engineering, environmental
What problem does this paper attempt to address?