Abstract:Purpose - This qualitative interview study compares public value prioritizations of ministers, members of parliament and senior public managers in the Netherlands. This article aims to answer the following central research question: how do Dutch political elites and administrative elites differ in their interpretation and prioritization of public values?Design/methodology/approach - Based on coding and categorization of 65 interviews this article shows how government elites in advanced western democracies interpret and assess four crucial public values: responsiveness, expertise, lawfulness and transparency.Findings - Political elites and administrative elites in the Netherlands are more similar than different in their prioritization and perceptions of public values. Differences are strongly related to role conceptions and institutional responsibilities, which are more traditional than most recent literature on politico-administrative dynamics would suggest.Research limitations/implications - Our qualitative findings are hard to generalize to larger populations of politicians and public managers in the Netherlands, let alone beyond the Netherlands. However, the testable research hypotheses we derive from our explorative study merit future testing among larger populations of respondents in different countries through survey research.Practical implications - Experienced values differences between both groups are smaller than their mutual perceptions would suggest.Originality/value - Most research on public values is quantitative in nature and focuses exclusively on public managers. By adding the politician to the equation we improve our understanding of how public values are enacted in real life and set the tone for a more inclusive research agenda on public values.

Public values assessment as a practice: integration of evidence and research agenda

Instruments of value: using the analytic tools of public value theory in teaching and practice

Without Blinders: Public Values Scholarship in Political Science, Economics, and Law—Content and Contribution to Public Administration

From Galaxies to Universe

Towards an empirical research agenda for public value theory

Public Values Research in the 21st Century: Where We Are, Where We Haven’t Been, and Where We Should Go

Rethinking value in public management

Public value management in digital transformation: a scoping review

Competing Values in Public Management

Values-Led Planning Approach in Spatial Development: A Methodology

Identifying public values and spatial conflicts in urban planning

Is Public Value Pluralism Paramount? the Intrinsic Multiplicity and Hybridity of Public Values

Public value and public sector accounting research: a structured literature review

Public Value Accounting: Establishing the Philosophical Basis

Beyond Biodiversity: Eliciting Diverse Values of Urban Green Spaces in Flanders

Environmental Challenges for Public Value Theory and Practice

Harmony In Hierarchy? How Politicians And Public Managers Prioritize Crucial Public Values

Public Value Privatized? the Need for a Continuous Emphasis on How to Actualize the Public Interest

Value Solidity in Government and Business: Results of an Empirical Study on Public and Private Sector Organizational Values

Sustainability Accounting and Reporting in the Public Sector: Towards Public Value Co-Creation?

Value Contextuality in Public Service Delivery. An Analysis of Street-Level Craftsmanship and Public–Private Partnerships