Abstract:Background: Numerous publications on natural resource valuations consider contexts where environmental assets at risk are significant to Indigenous Peoples and their estates. In the last two decades alone, many applied studies have aimed at investigating the 'value' of socio-environmental outcomes from the perspectives of the general populations including Indigenous Peoples. The term 'value' is often invoked in varying contexts ranging from empirical research to Natural Resource Management (NRM) strategies and policies. Underpinning all valuation exercises is a conceptual approach to defining and analyzing value, which is contextual given that different philosophies and worldviews consider nature's 'value' differently. Our objective was to understand value philosophies underpinning diverse NRM 'value' paradigms and to evaluate compatibility with Indigenous Peoples' value attribution. Method: We conducted a systematic search for publications on nature studies from multiple databases using a Boolean strategy. The processes for literature identification and selection are presented in a PRISMA flowchart. The study then critically reviewed and synthesized insights from the literature on the interpretations, conceptualizations, and elicitations of value, particularly in contexts where NRM influences Indigenous estates. Review results: We found that philosophical perspectives define how 'value' is conceptualized and evaluated. Most studies reviewed rested on the economic paradigm grounded in anthropocentric utilitarian value-framing, and limited studies considered a relational value lens that reflects Indigenous Peoples' value attribution for the natural environment. A relational lens sits outside of the usual 'instrumental versus intrinsic' value dichotomy and deems human-nature connections coupled, and worthy in themselves. Discussion: The paper demonstrates the commonalities and inconsistencies across diverse value conceptualizations and describes emerging pluralistic approaches consistent with Indigenous value attribution. A novel framework for understanding and bridging the different conceptual and analytical valuation lenses, particularly on water, is presented ensuring that multiple, complex, and distinct value dimensions are empirically bridged in studies involving Indigenous Peoples.

Public Values Research in the 21st Century: Where We Are, Where We Haven’t Been, and Where We Should Go

From Galaxies to Universe

Without Blinders: Public Values Scholarship in Political Science, Economics, and Law—Content and Contribution to Public Administration

Public values assessment as a practice: integration of evidence and research agenda

Towards an empirical research agenda for public value theory

Beyond Biodiversity: Eliciting Diverse Values of Urban Green Spaces in Flanders

Taking Stock on How We Research the Third Sector: Diversity, Pluralism, and Openness

Is Public Value Pluralism Paramount? the Intrinsic Multiplicity and Hybridity of Public Values

Environmental Challenges for Public Value Theory and Practice

Public Value Privatized? the Need for a Continuous Emphasis on How to Actualize the Public Interest

Competing Values in Public Management

Rethinking value in public management

Public Values in Western Europe: A Temporal Perspective

Identifying public values and spatial conflicts in urban planning

PV Energy Communities—Challenges and Barriers from a Consumer Perspective: A Literature Review

Beyond the “Third Wave of Positive Psychology”: Challenges and Opportunities for Future Research

“All quiet on the non-Western front?” A review of public service motivation scholarship in non-Western contexts

Value Solidity in Government and Business

Value Solidity in Government and Business: Results of an Empirical Study on Public and Private Sector Organizational Values

Nature's value, philosophies, theories, and concepts: a critical review and suggestions for future indigenous research

Introduction to Topical Collection: Changing Values and Energy Systems