Abstract:Introduction: The importance of including people affected by research (e.g., community members, citizens or patient partners) is increasingly recognized across the breadth of institutions involved in connecting research with action. Yet, the increasing rhetoric of inclusion remains situated in research systems that tend to reward traditional dissemination and uphold power dynamics in ways that centre particular (privileged) voices over others. In research explicitly interested in doing research with those most affected by the issue or outcomes, research teams need to know how to advance meaningful inclusion. This study focused on listening to voices often excluded from research processes to understand what meaningful inclusion looks and feels like, and asked what contributes to being or feeling tokenized. Methods: In this deliberative dialogue study, 16 participants with experience of navigating social exclusions and contributing to research activities reflected on what makes for meaningful experiences of inclusion. Using a co-production approach, with a diversely representative research team of 15 that included patient and community partners, we used critically reflective dialogue to guide an inclusive process to study design and implementation, from conceptualization of research questions through to writing. Results: We heard that: research practices, partnerships and systems all contribute to experiences of inclusion or exclusion; the insufficiency or absence of standards for accountability amplifies the experience of exclusion; and inclusive practices require intention, planning, reflection and resources. Conclusions: We offer evidence-informed recommendations for the deeply relational work and practices for inclusivity, focused on promising practices for cultivating welcoming systems, spaces and relationships. Patient or public contribution: This work reflects a co-production approach, where people who use and are affected by research results actively partnered in the research process, including study design, data-generating activities, analysis and interpretation, and writing. Several of these partners are authors of this manuscript.

Taking Stock on How We Research the Third Sector: Diversity, Pluralism, and Openness

Advancing Research Methodologies in Management: Revisiting Debates, Setting New Grounds for Pluralism

Increasing Inclusivity in Developmental Research

Third sector crisis management and resilience: Reflections and directions

Introduction to Teachers as Researchers: A Diversity of Methods for a Diversity of Voices

Fostering and sustaining transnational solidarities for transformative social change: Advancing community psychology research and action

Openness as Organizing Principle: Introduction to the Special Issue

Ethical considerations in social work research

Research Perspectives: Through Whose Eyes? The Critical Concept of Researcher Perspective

Strategies for advancing inclusive biodiversity research through equitable practices and collective responsibility

We must discuss research environments

When Methods Meet Motives: methodological pluralism in Social Work research

Public Values Research in the 21st Century: Where We Are, Where We Haven’t Been, and Where We Should Go

Investigating the Third Space: A New Agenda for Teacher Education Research

Capturing the dynamics of the sharing economy: Institutional research on the plural forms and practices of sharing economy organizations

Navigating social work practice research challenges: collaboration, participant rights and ethics

Introduction to the Special Issue on Open Innovation in Science

Introduction. Making work better

Relational practices for meaningful inclusion in health research: Results of a deliberative dialogue study

Centering relationships to place for more meaningful research and engagement

Building on Its Past: The Future of Business and Society Scholarship