Abstract:Purpose - This qualitative interview study compares public value prioritizations of ministers, members of parliament and senior public managers in the Netherlands. This article aims to answer the following central research question: how do Dutch political elites and administrative elites differ in their interpretation and prioritization of public values?Design/methodology/approach - Based on coding and categorization of 65 interviews this article shows how government elites in advanced western democracies interpret and assess four crucial public values: responsiveness, expertise, lawfulness and transparency.Findings - Political elites and administrative elites in the Netherlands are more similar than different in their prioritization and perceptions of public values. Differences are strongly related to role conceptions and institutional responsibilities, which are more traditional than most recent literature on politico-administrative dynamics would suggest.Research limitations/implications - Our qualitative findings are hard to generalize to larger populations of politicians and public managers in the Netherlands, let alone beyond the Netherlands. However, the testable research hypotheses we derive from our explorative study merit future testing among larger populations of respondents in different countries through survey research.Practical implications - Experienced values differences between both groups are smaller than their mutual perceptions would suggest.Originality/value - Most research on public values is quantitative in nature and focuses exclusively on public managers. By adding the politician to the equation we improve our understanding of how public values are enacted in real life and set the tone for a more inclusive research agenda on public values.

Harmony In Hierarchy? How Politicians And Public Managers Prioritize Crucial Public Values

Elite Ethics: Comparing Public Values Prioritization Between Administrative Elites and Political Elites

WHAT’S VALUED MOST? SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE ORGANIZATIONAL VALUES OF THE PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTOR

Value Solidity in Government and Business

Mandarins Versus Machiavellians? on Differences Between Work Motivations of Administrative and Political Elites

Value Solidity in Government and Business: Results of an Empirical Study on Public and Private Sector Organizational Values

The Bureaucrat, the Businessperson, and Their Perceptions of Each Other's Value Orientation: Empirical Notions on the Other Sector's Most Important Organizational Values

Is Public Value Pluralism Paramount? the Intrinsic Multiplicity and Hybridity of Public Values

Competing Values in Public Administration

Public Sector Value Congruence among Old and New EU Member-States?: Empirical Evidence from the Netherlands, Denmark, and Estonia

Business and Government Ethics in the “new” and “old” EU: an Empirical Account of Public–Private Value Congruence in Slovenia and the Netherlands

THE CONTENT AND CONTEXT OF ORGANIZATIONAL ETHICS

Confucius Meets Weber or “managerialism Takes All”? Comparing Civil Servant Values in China and the Netherlands

Central Values of Government and Business: Differences, Similarities and Conflicts1

Worlds Apart? Worlds Aligned? the Perceptions and Prioritizations of Civil Servant Values among Civil Servants from China and the Netherlands

Competing Values in Public Management

Without Blinders: Public Values Scholarship in Political Science, Economics, and Law—Content and Contribution to Public Administration

Public Value Privatized? the Need for a Continuous Emphasis on How to Actualize the Public Interest

On Value Differences Experienced by Sector Switchers

BUSINESS: DIFFERENCES, SIMILARITIES AND CONFLICTS1

Communication in the heart of policy and the conduct of conduct: Government communication in the Netherlands