Abstract:BackgroundShock is common in critically ill and injured patients. Survival during shock is highly dependent on rapid restoration of tissue oxygenation with therapeutic goals based on cardiac output (CO) optimization. Despite the clinical availability of numerous minimally invasive monitors of CO, limited supporting performance data are available.MethodsFollowing approval of the University of Saskatchewan Animal Research Ethics Board, we assessed the performance and trending ability of PiCCOplus™, FloTrac™, and CardioQ-ODM™ across a range of CO states in pigs. In addition, we assessed the ability of invasive mean arterial blood pressure (iMAP) to follow changes in CO using a periaortic transit-time flow probe as the reference method. Statistical analysis was performed with function-fail, bias and precision, percent error, and linear regression at all flow, low-flow (> 1 standard deviation [SD] below the mean), and high-flow (> 1 SD above the mean) CO conditions.ResultsWe made a total of 116,957 paired CO measurements. The non-invasive CO monitors often failed to provide a CO value (CardioQ-ODM: 40.6% failed measurements; 99% confidence interval [CI], 38.5 to 42.6; FloTrac: 9.6% failed measurements; 99% CI, 8.7 to 10.5; PiCCOplus: 4.7% failed measurements; 99% CI, 4.5 to 4.9; all comparisons, P < 0.001). The invasive mean arterial pressure provided zero failures, failing less often than any of the tested CO monitors (all comparisons, P < 0.001). The PiCCOplus was most interchangeable with the flow probe at all flow states: PiCCOplus (20% error; 99% CI, 19 to 22), CardioQ-ODM (25% error; 99% CI, 23 to 27), FloTrac (34% error; 99% CI, 32 to 38) (all comparisons, P < 0.001). At low-flow states, CardioQ-ODM (43% error; 99% CI, 32 to 63) and Flotrac (45% error; 99% CI, 33 to 70) had similar interchangeability (P = 0.07), both superior to PiCCOplus (48% error; 99% CI, 42 to 60) (P < 0.001). Regarding CO trending, the CardioQ-ODM (correlation coefficient, 0.82; 99% CI, 0.81 to 0.83) was statistically superior to other monitors including iMAP, but at low flows iMAP (correlation coefficient, 0.58; 99% CI, 0.58 to 0.60) was superior to all minimally invasive CO monitors (all comparisons P < 0.001).ConclusionsNone of the minimally invasive monitors of CO performed well at all tested flows. Invasive mean arterial blood pressure most closely tracked CO change at critical flow states.

Noninvasive Hemodynamic Monitoring in the ICU

Review of Physiological Parameters Monitoring Technology in the ICU

Advances in Clinical Application of Electrical Impedance Tomography to Evaluate Pulmonary Perfusion in Critically Ill Patients

Changing trends of hemodynamic monitoring in ICU - from invasive to non-invasive methods: Are we there yet?

Noninvasive Hemodynamic Monitors, What Is New and Old

Less invasive methods of advanced hemodynamic monitoring: principles, devices, and their role in the perioperative hemodynamic optimization

A performance comparison of the most commonly used minimally invasive monitors of cardiac output

Carotid Doppler ultrasound for non-invasive haemodynamic monitoring: a narrative review

Clinical evaluation compared to the pulse indicator continuous cardiac output system in the hemodynamic assessment of critically ill patients.

Neuromonitoring in the ICU: noninvasive and invasive modalities for critically ill children and neonates

Use of the PiCCO System in Critically Ill Patients with Septic Shock and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: a Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Hemodynamic Management of Cardiogenic Shock in the Intensive Care Unit

Invasive Monitoring in the Intensive Care Unit

Perioperative hemodynamic monitoring in cardiac surgery

Contemporary perioperative haemodynamic monitoring.

Noninvasive Cardiac Output Monitoring (NICOM) in the Critically Ill Patient Undergoing Endotracheal Intubation: A Prospective Observational Study

Utility of NICaS Non-Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19

A Direct Assessment of Noninvasive Continuous Blood Pressure Monitoring in the Emergency Department and Intensive Care Unit

Haemodynamic monitoring during noncardiac surgery: past, present, and future

[Clinical application of the electric cardiometry based non-invasive ICON® hemodynamic monitor]

Use of intracranial compliance to assist arterial blood pressure adjustment in critical patients: Short report and review of the literature