Abstract:Background Hemodynamic assessment of critically ill patients is a challenging endeavor, and advanced monitoring techniques are often required to guide treatment choices. Given the technical complexity and occasional unavailability of these techniques, estimation of cardiac function based on clinical examination is valuable for critical care physicians to diagnose circulatory shock. Yet, the lack of knowledge on how to best conduct and teach the clinical examination to estimate cardiac function has reduced its accuracy to almost that of “flipping a coin.” Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the decision-making process underlying estimates of cardiac function of patients acutely admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) based on current standardized clinical examination using Bayesian methods. Methods Patient data were collected as part of the Simple Intensive Care Studies-I (SICS-I) prospective cohort study. All adult patients consecutively admitted to the ICU with an expected stay longer than 24 hours were included, for whom clinical examination was conducted and cardiac function was estimated. Using these data, first, the probabilistic dependencies between the examiners’ estimates and the set of clinically measured variables upon which these rely were analyzed using a Bayesian network. Second, the accuracy of cardiac function estimates was assessed by comparison to the cardiac index values measured by critical care ultrasonography. Results A total of 1075 patients were included, of which 783 patients had validated cardiac index measurements. A Bayesian network analysis identified two clinical variables upon which cardiac function estimate is conditionally dependent, namely, noradrenaline administration and presence of delayed capillary refill time or mottling. When the patient received noradrenaline, the probability of cardiac function being estimated as reasonable or good P(ER,G) was lower, irrespective of whether the patient was mechanically ventilated (P[ER,G|ventilation, noradrenaline]=0.63, P[ER,G|ventilation, no noradrenaline]=0.91, P[ER,G|no ventilation, noradrenaline]=0.67, P[ER,G|no ventilation, no noradrenaline]=0.93). The same trend was found for capillary refill time or mottling. Sensitivity of estimating a low cardiac index was 26% and 39% and specificity was 83% and 74% for students and physicians, respectively. Positive and negative likelihood ratios were 1.53 (95% CI 1.19-1.97) and 0.87 (95% CI 0.80-0.95), respectively, overall. Conclusions The conditional dependencies between clinical variables and the cardiac function estimates resulted in a network consistent with known physiological relations. Conditional probability queries allow for multiple clinical scenarios to be recreated, which provide insight into the possible thought process underlying the examiners’ cardiac function estimates. This information can help develop interactive digital training tools for students and physicians and contribute toward the goal of further improving the diagnostic accuracy of clinical examination in ICU patients. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02912624; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02912624

[Clinical application of the electric cardiometry based non-invasive ICON® hemodynamic monitor]

Review of Physiological Parameters Monitoring Technology in the ICU

Noninvasive Hemodynamic Monitoring in the ICU

Clinical evaluation compared to the pulse indicator continuous cardiac output system in the hemodynamic assessment of critically ill patients.

Changing trends of hemodynamic monitoring in ICU - from invasive to non-invasive methods: Are we there yet?

Clinical Practice of the Insertable Cardiac Monitor for Unexplained Syncope

Less invasive methods of advanced hemodynamic monitoring: principles, devices, and their role in the perioperative hemodynamic optimization

Clinical significance of pulse indicator continuous cardiac output in pediatric patients undergoing open-heart surgery

Noninvasive Hemodynamic Monitors, What Is New and Old

Maternal cardiovascular hemodynamics in normotensive versus preeclamptic pregnancies: a prospective longitudinal study using a noninvasive cardiac system (NICaS™)

Utility of NICaS Non-Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19

A Direct Assessment of Noninvasive Continuous Blood Pressure Monitoring in the Emergency Department and Intensive Care Unit

Non-invasive Cardiac Output Measurement in Children Using Bioreactance:A Comparison with Echocar-Diography

Hospital-Based Electrocardiographic Monitoring: The Good, the Not So Good, and Untapped Potential

Comparison analysis of clinical evaluation with pulse indicator continuous cardiac output monitor in the hemodynamic assessment of critically ill patients

Echocardiographic Evaluation of Hemodynamics in Neonates and Children

Noninvasive Cardiac Output Monitoring (NICOM) in the Critically Ill Patient Undergoing Endotracheal Intubation: A Prospective Observational Study

A Bayesian Network Analysis of the Diagnostic Process and its Accuracy to Determine How Clinicians Estimate Cardiac Function in Critically Ill Patients: Prospective Observational Cohort Study

Carotid Doppler ultrasound for non-invasive haemodynamic monitoring: a narrative review

A Wireless, Skin-Interfaced Biosensor for Cerebral Hemodynamic Monitoring in Pediatric Care

CardioMEMS™: a tool for remote hemodynamic monitoring of chronic heart failure patients