Abstract:Although guidelines provide excellent expert guidance for managing patients with septic shock, they leave room for personalization according to patients' condition. Hemodynamic monitoring depends on the evolution phase: salvage, optimization, stabilization, and de-escalation. Initially during the salvage phase, monitoring to identify shock etiology and severity should include arterial pressure and lactate measurements together with clinical examination, particularly skin mottling and capillary refill time. Low diastolic blood pressure may trigger vasopressor initiation. At this stage, echocardiography may be useful to identify significant cardiac dysfunction. During the optimization phase, echocardiographic monitoring should be pursued and completed by the assessment of tissue perfusion through central or mixed-venous oxygen saturation, lactate, and carbon dioxide veno-arterial gradient. Transpulmonary thermodilution and the pulmonary artery catheter should be considered in the most severe patients. Fluid therapy also depends on shock phases. While administered liberally during the resuscitation phase, fluid responsiveness should be assessed during the optimization phase. During stabilization, fluid infusion should be minimized. In the de-escalation phase, safe fluid withdrawal could be achieved by ensuring tissue perfusion is preserved. Norepinephrine is recommended as first-line vasopressor therapy, while vasopressin may be preferred in some patients. Essential questions remain regarding optimal vasopressor selection, combination therapy, and the most effective and safest escalation. Serum renin and the angiotensin I/II ratio may identify patients who benefit most from angiotensin II. The optimal therapeutic strategy for shock requiring high-dose vasopressors is scant. In all cases, vasopressor therapy should be individualized, based on clinical evaluation and blood flow measurements to avoid excessive vasoconstriction. Inotropes should be considered in patients with decreased cardiac contractility associated with impaired tissue perfusion. Based on pharmacologic properties, we suggest as the first test a limited dose of dobutamine, to add enoximone or milrinone in the second line and substitute or add levosimendan if inefficient. Regarding adjunctive therapies, while hydrocortisone is nowadays advised in patients receiving high doses of vasopressors, patients responding to corticosteroids may be identified in the future by the analysis of selected cytokines or specific transcriptomic endotypes. To conclude, although some general rules apply for shock management, a personalized approach should be considered for hemodynamic monitoring and support.

Hemodynamic Management of Cardiogenic Shock in the Intensive Care Unit

A Standardized and Comprehensive Approach to the Management of Cardiogenic Shock

Management of cardiogenic shock: state-of-the-art

Contemporary approach to cardiogenic shock care: a state-of-the-art review

A plea for personalization of the hemodynamic management of septic shock

Haemodynamic support with percutaneous devices in patients with cardiogenic shock: the current evidence of mechanical circulatory support

Medical therapy of cardiogenic shock: Contemporary use of inotropes and vasopressors

Anticoagulation Medications, Monitoring, and Outcomes in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock Requiring Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support

Mixed Cardiogenic Shock: A Proposal for Standardized Classification, a Hemodynamic Definition, and Framework for Management

Management of cardiogenic shock: a narrative review

Discussion of hemodynamic optimization strategies and the canonical understanding of hemodynamics during biventricular mechanical support in cardiogenic shock: does the flow balance make the difference?

Contemporary Management of Cardiogenic Shock: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Vasoactive pharmacologic therapy in cardiogenic shock: a critical review

Prognostic Significance of Haemodynamic Parameters in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock

[Acute heart failure and cardiogenic shock: pathophysiology, clinical aspects and management strategies]

Management and Outcomes of Cardiogenic Shock in Cardiac ICUs with Versus Without Shock Teams.

From Emergency Care Protocols to Long-Term Therapeutic Strategies

Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support in Acute Heart Failure Complicated with Cardiogenic Shock

Vasopressor and Inotrope Therapy in Cardiac Critical Care

Inotropes, vasopressors, and mechanical circulatory support for treatment of cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock patients