Abstract:Dual-process approaches of decision-making examine the interaction between affective/intuitive and deliberative processes underlying value judgment. From this perspective, decisions are supported by a combination of relatively explicit capabilities for abstract reasoning and relatively implicit evolved domain-general as well as learned domain-specific affective responses. One such approach, the somatic markers hypothesis (SMH), expresses these implicit processes as a system of evolved primary emotions supplemented by associations between affect and experience that accrue over lifetime, or somatic markers. In this view, somatic markers are useful only if their local capability to predict the value of an action is above a baseline equal to the predictive capability of the combined rational and primary emotional subsystems. We argue that decision-making has often been conceived of as a linear process: the effect of decision sequences is additive, local utility is cumulative, and there is no strong environmental feedback. This widespread assumption can have consequences for answering questions regarding the relative weight between the systems and their interaction within a cognitive architecture. We introduce a mathematical formalization of the SMH and study it in situations of dynamic, non-linear decision chains using a discrete-time stochastic model. We find, contrary to expectations, that decision-making events can interact non-additively with the environment in apparently paradoxical ways. We find that in non-lethal situations, primary emotions are represented globally over and above their local weight, showing a tendency for overcautiousness in situated decision chains. We also show that because they tend to counteract this trend, poorly attuned somatic markers that by themselves do not locally enhance decision-making, can still produce an overall positive effect. This result has developmental and evolutionary implications since, by promoting exploratory behavior, somatic markers would seem to be beneficial even at early stages when experiential attunement is poor. Although the model is formulated in terms of the SMH, the implications apply to dual systems theories in general since it makes minimal assumptions about the nature of the processes involved.

Dual Process Theory: Embodied and Predictive; Symbolic and Classical

A Unified Theory of Dual-Process Control

Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition.

Fast logic?: Examining the time course assumption of dual process theory

The Shifting Sands of Creative Thinking: Connections to Dual Process Theory

How to Tell a Dualist?

Understanding dual process cognition via the minimum description length principle

Dual Process Theories in Behavioral Economics and Neuroeconomics: a Critical Review

Metacognitive control in single- vs. dual-process theory

Dual-process modeling of sequential decision making in the balloon analogue risk task

From theory to practice: a roadmap for applying dual-process theory in design cognition research

Smooth coping: an embodied, Heideggerian approach to dual-process theory

Dual-process reflective equilibrium: rethinking the interplay between intuition and reflection in moral reasoning

A Dual-Process Account for Diverse Reasoning Strategies Underlying Symmetries and Asymmetries Between Inferences Between Disjunctions and Conditionals

Unreliable Gut Feelings Can Lead to Correct Decisions: The Somatic Marker Hypothesis in Non-Linear Decision Chains

Toward a formal theory of embodied cognition

Cooperative versus competitive influences of emotion and cognition on decision making: A primer for psychiatry research

Dual Process Theory for Large Language Models: An overview of using Psychology to address hallucination and reliability issues

A dual-process approach to cooperative decision-making under uncertainty

Multiple Systems in Decision Making

Dual Coding Theory Explains Biphasic Collective Computation in Neural Decision-Making