Abstract:Dual-process theories play a central role in both psychology and neuroscience, figuring prominently in domains ranging from executive control to reward-based learning to judgment and decision making. In each of these domains, two mechanisms appear to operate concurrently, one relatively high in computational complexity, the other relatively simple. Why is neural information processing organized in this way? We propose an answer to this question based on the notion of compression. The key insight is that dual-process structure can enhance adaptive behavior by allowing an agent to minimize the description length of its own behavior. We apply a single model based on this observation to findings from research on executive control, reward-based learning, and judgment and decision making, showing that seemingly diverse dual-process phenomena can be understood as domain-specific consequences of a single underlying set of computational principles. Since the founding of psychology as a scientific discipline, scientists have recognized that much of human and animal behavior falls into two separate categories: slow, effortful deliberation (e.g., solving math problems) and fast, automatic habitual action selection (e.g., signing your name). Such "dual process" theories of cognition have since been developed to explain a number of phenomena from across psychology and neuroscience. Despite all of these experimental results, understanding why this pattern in behavior exists has proven elusive. In this work, we develop a model of dual process cognition which can be derived independently from experimental observations about the brain. Our theory proposes that the division between effortful and automatic behavior emerges as a natural result of the need to balance mastery of the tasks we have to complete every day and flexibility to adapt to new circumstances. In a large number of computer simulations, our model captures many behavioral phenomena associated with "dual process" cognition across multiple subfields of cognitive science.

A Unified Theory of Dual-Process Control

Understanding dual process cognition via the minimum description length principle

The Dual Mechanisms of Cognitive Control Project

Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition.

Investigating Managers' Fine-Grained Evaluation Processes In Organizations: Exploring Two Dual-Process Perspectives

Dual Process Theory: Embodied and Predictive; Symbolic and Classical

The variable nature of cognitive control: a dual mechanisms framework

Dual Coding Theory Explains Biphasic Collective Computation in Neural Decision-Making

Dynamics of cognitive control: Theoretical bases, paradigms, and a view for the future

Metacognitive control in single- vs. dual-process theory

Multiple Systems in Decision Making

Dual Process Theories in Behavioral Economics and Neuroeconomics: a Critical Review

Control over a mixture of policies determines change of mind topology during continuous choice

Canonical Cortical Circuits and the Duality of Bayesian Inference and Optimal Control

A dual-networks architecture of top-down control

Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism

Attention, Short-Term Memory, and Action Selection: A Unifying Theory

Dual-Process Theory of Thought and Inhibitory Control: An ALE Meta-Analysis

A Dual Adaptive Control Theory Inspired by Hebbian Associative Learning

Panpsychism and dualism in the science of consciousness

Same, Same but Different? A Multi-Method Review of the Processes Underlying Executive Control