Predicting the CPT-based pile set-up parameters using HHO-RF and WOA-RF hybrid models

Lijuan Duan,Miao Wu,Qiong Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-09843-4

2022-03-24

Arabian Journal of Geosciences

Abstract:<p class="a-plus-plus">During the estimation of pile strength (<span class="a-plus-plus inline-equation id-i-eq1"><span class="a-plus-plus equation-source format-t-e-x"><span class="mjpage"><svg xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" width="2.59ex" height="2.509ex" style="vertical-align: -0.671ex;" viewBox="0 -791.3 1115.1 1080.4" role="img" focusable="false" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="matrix(1 0 0 -1 0 0)"> <use xlink:href="#MJMATHI-52" x="0" y="0"></use> <use transform="scale(0.707)" xlink:href="#MJMATHI-74" x="1074" y="-213"></use></g></svg></span></span></span>), a parameter is utilized called pile set-up parameter (<span class="a-plus-plus inline-equation id-i-eq2"><span class="a-plus-plus equation-source format-t-e-x"><span class="mjpage"><svg xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" width="1.743ex" height="2.176ex" style="vertical-align: -0.338ex;" viewBox="0 -791.3 750.5 936.9" role="img" focusable="false" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="matrix(1 0 0 -1 0 0)"> <use xlink:href="#MJMATHI-41" x="0" y="0"></use></g></svg></span></span></span>). The value of this parameter was so controversial because it relates to many factors, such as the material of pile, the resistance of pile, type of pile, dimension of pile, and type of soil. So, developing prediction models based on neural networks could solve this matter. Therefore, this study aimed to develop hybrid random forest (RF) models to predict the pile set-up parameter (<span class="a-plus-plus inline-equation id-i-eq3"><span class="a-plus-plus equation-source format-t-e-x"><span class="mjpage"><svg xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" width="1.743ex" height="2.176ex" style="vertical-align: -0.338ex;" viewBox="0 -791.3 750.5 936.9" role="img" focusable="false" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="matrix(1 0 0 -1 0 0)"> <use xlink:href="#MJMATHI-41" x="0" y="0"></use></g></svg></span></span></span>) from cone penetration test (CPT) for the design aim of the projects. To this goal, the essential hyperparameters of the RF model were tuned by applying the whale optimization algorithm (WOA) and Harris hawks optimization (HHO). The selected variables as input were average corrected cone tip resistance, average skin friction, and average overburden pressure. Results show that both models have acceptable performance in predicting the set-up parameter <span class="a-plus-plus inline-equation id-i-eq4"><span class="a-plus-plus equation-source format-t-e-x"><span class="mjpage"><svg xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" width="1.743ex" height="2.176ex" style="vertical-align: -0.338ex;" viewBox="0 -791.3 750.5 936.9" role="img" focusable="false" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="matrix(1 0 0 -1 0 0)"> <use xlink:href="#MJMATHI-41" x="0" y="0"></use></g></svg></span></span></span>, with coefficient of determination (<span class="a-plus-plus inline-equation id-i-eq5"><span class="a-plus-plus equation-source format-t-e-x"><span class="mjpage"><svg xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" width="2.818ex" height="2.676ex" style="vertical-align: -0.338ex;" viewBox="0 -1006.6 1213.4 1152.1" role="img" focusable="false" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="matrix(1 0 0 -1 0 0)"> <use xlink:href="#MJMATHI-52" x="0" y="0"></use> <use transform="scale(0.707)" xlink:href="#MJMAIN-32" x="1074" y="581"></use></g></svg></span></span></span>) larger than 0.8699, representing the admissible correlation between observed and predicted values. It is understandable that, in both the learning and validating phase, HHO-RF has better proficiency than the WOA-RF model, with <span class="a-plus-plus inline-equation id-i-eq6"><span class="a-plus-plus equation-source format-t-e-x"><span class="mjpage"><svg xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" width="2.818ex" height="2.676ex" style="vertical-align: -0.338ex;" viewBox="0 -1006.6 1213.4 1152.1" role="img" focusable="false" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="matrix(1 0 0 -1 0 0)"> <use xlink:href="#MJMATHI-52" x="0" y="0"></use> <use transform="scale(0.707)" xlink:href="#MJMAIN-32" x="1074" y="581"></use></g></svg></span></span></span> and root mean square error (RMSE) equal to 0.9436 and 0.0307 for the training phase, and 0.8866 and 0.0371 for testing data, respectively. Moreover, by considering all performance accuracy criteria, the results demonstrate the ability of the HHO algorithm in determining the optimal value of RF hyperparameters than WOA.</p><svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" style="display: none;"><defs id="MathJax_SVG_glyphs"><path stroke-width="1" id="MJMATHI-52" d="M230 637Q203 637 198 638T193 649Q193 676 204 682Q206 683 378 683Q550 682 564 680Q620 672 658 652T712 606T733 563T739 529Q739 484 710 445T643 385T576 351T538 338L545 333Q612 295 612 223Q612 212 607 162T602 80V71Q602 53 603 43T614 25T640 16Q668 16 686 38T712 85Q717 99 720 102T735 105Q755 105 755 93Q755 75 731 36Q693 -21 641 -21H632Q571 -21 531 4T487 82Q487 109 502 166T517 239Q517 290 474 313Q459 320 449 321T378 323H309L277 193Q244 61 244 59Q244 55 245 54T252 50T269 48T302 46H333Q339 38 339 37T336 19Q332 6 326 0H311Q275 2 180 2Q146 2 117 2T71 2T50 1Q33 1 33 10Q33 12 36 24Q41 43 46 45Q50 46 61 46H67Q94 46 127 49Q141 52 146 61Q149 65 218 339T287 628Q287 635 230 637ZM630 554Q630 586 609 608T523 636Q521 636 500 636T462 637H440Q393 637 386 627Q385 624 352 494T319 361Q319 360 388 360Q466 361 492 367Q556 377 592 426Q608 449 619 486T630 554Z"></path><path stroke-width="1" id="MJMATHI-74" d="M26 385Q19 392 19 395Q19 399 22 411T27 425Q29 430 36 430T87 431H140L159 511Q162 522 166 540T173 566T179 586T187 603T197 615T211 624T229 626Q247 625 254 615T261 596Q261 589 252 549T232 470L222 433Q222 431 272 431H323Q330 424 330 420Q330 398 317 385H210L174 240Q135 80 135 68Q135 26 162 26Q197 26 230 60T283 144Q285 150 288 151T303 153H307Q322 153 322 145Q322 142 319 133Q314 117 301 95T267 48T216 6T155 -11Q125 -11 98 4T59 56Q57 64 57 83V101L92 241Q127 382 128 383Q128 385 77 385H26Z"></path><path stroke-width="1" id="MJMATHI-41" d="M208 74Q208 50 254 46Q272 46 272 35Q272 34 270 22Q267 8 264 4T251 0Q249 0 239 0T205 1T141 2Q70 2 50 0H42Q35 7 35 11Q37 38 48 46H62Q132 49 164 96Q170 102 345 401T523 704Q530 716 547 716H555H572Q578 707 578 706L606 383Q634 60 636 57Q641 46 701 46Q726 46 726 36Q726 34 723 22Q720 7 718 4T704 0Q701 0 690 0T651 1T578 2Q484 2 455 0H443Q437 6 437 9T439 27Q443 40 445 43L449 46H469Q523 49 533 63L521 213H283L249 155Q208 86 208 74ZM516 260Q516 271 504 416T490 562L463 519Q447 492 400 412L310 260L413 259Q516 259 516 260Z"></path><path stroke-width="1" id="MJMAIN-32" d="M109 429Q82 429 66 447T50 491Q50 562 103 614T235 666Q326 666 387 610T449 465Q449 422 429 383T381 315T301 241Q265 210 201 149L142 93L218 92Q375 92 385 97Q392 99 409 186V189H449V186Q448 183 436 95T421 3V0H50V19V31Q50 38 56 46T86 81Q115 113 136 137Q145 147 170 174T204 211T233 244T261 278T284 308T305 340T320 369T333 401T340 431T343 464Q343 527 309 573T212 619Q179 619 154 602T119 569T109 550Q109 549 114 549Q132 549 151 535T170 489Q170 464 154 447T109 429Z"></path></defs></svg>

geosciences, multidisciplinary