Abstract:Over the past few decades, a new form of governance has emerged to replace adversarial and managerial modes of policy making and implementation. Collaborative governance, as it has come to be known, brings public and private stakeholders together in collective forums with public agencies to engage in consensus-oriented decision making. In this article, we conduct a meta-analytical study of the existing literature on collaborative governance with the goal of elaborating a contingency model of collaborative governance. After reviewing 137 cases of collaborative governance across a range of policy sectors, we identify critical variables that will influence whether or not this mode of governance will produce successful collaboration. These variables include the prior history of conflict or cooperation, the incentives for stakeholders to participate, power and resources imbalances, leadership, and institutional design. We also identify a series of factors that are crucial within the collaborative process itself. These factors include face-to-face dialogue, trust building, and the development of commitment and shared understanding. We found that a virtuous cycle of collaboration tends to develop when collaborative forums focus on ‘‘small wins’’ that deepen trust, commitment, and shared understanding. The article concludes with a discussion of the implications of our contingency model for practitioners and for future research on collaborative governance. Over the last two decades, a new strategy of governing called ‘‘collaborative governance’’ has developed. This mode of governance brings multiple stakeholders together in common forums with public agencies to engage in consensus-oriented decision making. In this article, we conduct a meta-analytical study of the existing literature on collaborative governance with the goal of elaborating a general model of collaborative governance. The ultimate goal is to develop a contingency approach to collaboration that can highlight conditions under which collaborative governance will be more or less effective as an

Radical and disruptive answers to downstream problems in collaborative governance?

Radical and incremental, a multi-leverage point approach to transformation in ocean governance

Two logics of democracy in collaborative governance: a mapping of clashes and compromises

Collaborative innovation in the public sector: the argument

Using Network Analysis to Identify Key Actors in Collaborative Governance Processes

Beyond engagement: Enhancing equity in collaborative water governance

Producing Agreements and Innovations in Collaborative Governance

Understanding Effectiveness in its Broader Context: Assessing Case Study Methodologies for Evaluating Collaborative Conservation Governance

Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice

Analyzing Collaborative Governance Through Social Network Analysis: A Case Study of River Management Along the Waal River in The Netherlands

Using a design approach to create collaborative governance

Output Performance of Collaborative Governance: Examining Collaborative Conditions for Achieving Output Performance of the Dutch Flood Protection Program

Democratic Theory and Network Governance

The Radical Flank Revisited: How Regulatory Discretion Shapes the Effectiveness of Social Activism on Business Outcomes

Managing wickedness in the Niger Delta: Can a new approach to multi-stakeholder governance increase voice and sustainability?

Augmenting the IAD framework to reveal power in collaborative governance – An illustrative application to resource industry dominated processes

Toward a Critical Theory of Collaborative Governance

Collaboration in Open Government Data Ecosystems: Open Cross-sector Sharing and Co-development of Data and Software

Exploring Collaborative Governance Processes Involving Nonprofits

Who benefits from collaborative governance? An empirical study from the energy sector