Abstract:In recent decades, there has been an increased emphasis on, and application of, collaborative and adaptive forms of environmental governance as a means to address complex social-ecological problems that cannot be achieved alone and support sustainable resource management. However, the majority of research in the collaborative governance and adaptability arena has relied on individual or small-n case studies. This has led to a multitude of definitions, indicators, and indices, which limits our ability to make inferences across cases and contexts. Relatedly, most research lacks formal tests of assumptions related to the dimensional structure and validity of constructs thought to represent collaborative dynamics and adaptability. There is a need for systematic and cross-case assessments situated within robust statistical frameworks to further our understanding of the forces and factors that cultivate collaborative governance and adaptability. We developed and administered a standardized survey assessment, grounded in the theory and practice of collaborative governance and adaptability, to fifteen collaborative projects funded under the Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program (CFLRP) in the United States. We then used confirmatory factor analysis to test the dimensional structure, reliability, and validity of our theoretically and empirically grounded measures. Results indicate the components of collaborative governance and adaptability comprise six dimensions - principled engagement, shared motivation, leadership, resources, knowledge and learning, and institutional arrangements. As expected, several dimensions were significantly related, and the pattern of inter-factor relationships aligned with theoretical and empirical assumptions. We also found that the six dimensions represent statistically reliable, valid, and distinct measures that may be used to evaluate collaborative governance and adaptability. While our focus was on the CFLRP, the assessment can be adapted in other collaborative environmental governance contexts and used as a foundation for addressing key research gaps, including relating collaborative environmental governance processes to social-ecological outcomes and collaborative adaptation and resilience through time. This is a critical line of work given the increased emphasis and reliance on long-term collaborative arrangements to achieve sustainability goals.

Output Performance of Collaborative Governance: Examining Collaborative Conditions for Achieving Output Performance of the Dutch Flood Protection Program

Analyzing Collaborative Governance Through Social Network Analysis: A Case Study of River Management Along the Waal River in The Netherlands

Asset management of flood defences as a co‐production—An analysis of cooperation in five situations in the Netherlands

Progress beyond policy making? Assessing the performance of Dutch-German cross-border cooperation in Deltarhine

Understanding Effectiveness in its Broader Context: Assessing Case Study Methodologies for Evaluating Collaborative Conservation Governance

The Environmental Performance of Participatory and Collaborative Governance: A Framework of Causal Mechanisms

Developing reliable and valid measures for evaluating collaborative governance and adaptability: An example from the Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program

Assessing Collaborative Governance Outcomes and Indicators across Spatial and Temporal Scales: Stewardship Contract Implementation by the United States Forest Service

Connecting the Composition of Collaborative Governance Structure to Community‐Level Performance in Homeless Services

Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice

Evaluating learning spaces in flood risk management in Germany: Lessons for governance research

Plugging the holes: Identifying potential avenues and limitations for furthering Dutch civil society contributions towards flood resilience

Using Network Analysis to Identify Key Actors in Collaborative Governance Processes

Examining the benefits of collaboration: the Provider-User Matrix for collaborative flood risk management illustrated by the case of the Ljusnan River, Sweden

Who benefits from collaborative governance? An empirical study from the energy sector

Policy learning in collaborative environmental governance processes

Assessing and Explaining Interagency Collaboration Performance: a Comparative Case Study of Local Governments in China

Improving flood risk governance through multi-stakeholder collaboration: a case study of Sweet Home informal settlement, Cape Town

Fostering Local Government Collaboration: An Empirical Analysis of Case Studies in Ohio

Collaborations in Environmental Initiatives for an Effective “Adaptive Governance” of Social–Ecological Systems: What Existing Literature Suggests

Collaborative Governance In Flood Mitigation In Bojonegoro Regency