Abstract:Abstract Online peer feedback is an effective instructional strategy to enhance students' learning processes and outcomes. However, the literature lacks a comprehensive understanding of the influential factors that play a key role in the effective implementation of online peer feedback. This systematic review provides an overview of the current state of online peer feedback implementation in higher education contexts and explores the role of students' characteristics and online learning environments in relation to their learning processes and outcomes. To achieve this goal, the PRISMA method was followed, and a coding scheme was developed to create a framework that can guide the implementation of online peer feedback in higher education settings. This framework depicts factors that should be taken into account for effective implementation of online peer feedback in terms of four dimensions: students' characteristics (demographic characteristics, academic background, and personality and psychological features), environmental conditions (learning platform and setting), learning processes (content, feedback activity design, and technology), and learning outcomes including cognitive outcomes (e.g., acquisition of knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation), behavioral outcomes (engagement, communication, and teamwork), and affective outcomes (satisfaction, motivation, attitude, self-efficacy, sense of autonomy, and confidence). We conclude this study by discussing the framework, limitations, and ideas for future research and practice.

Students’ perceptions of the peer-feedback experience in MOOCs

Learning to Improve the Quality Peer Feedback Through Experience with Peer Feedback

Is peer review an appropriate form of assessment in a MOOC? Student participation and performance in formative peer review

Student satisfaction with use of an online peer feedback system

Peer assessment in a project-based engineering course: comparing between on-campus and online learning environments

Factors influencing students’ peer feedback uptake: instructional design matters

Online Versus Offline Peer Feedback in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis

Exploring the Type and Quality of Peer Feedback in a Graduate-Level Blended Course

What Makes Students Contribute More Peer Feedback? the Role of Within-Course Experience with Peer Feedback

When Do Students Provide More Peer Feedback? the Roles of Performance and Prior Feedback Experiences

Student Peer Review and Receptiveness to Feedback in Global Classrooms

Design, implementation, and evaluation of an online supported peer feedback module to enhance students' argumentative essay quality

Learners’ perceived advantages and social-affective dispositions toward online peer feedback in academic writing

Peer Feedback Improves Students’ Academic Self-Concept in Higher Education

Perception of online feedback and its impact on cognitive and emotional engagement with feedback

Online peer feedback in higher education: A synthesis of the literature

The factor structure of the peer-feedback orientation scale (PFOS): toward a measure for assessing students’ peer-feedback dispositions

Peer-to-peer dialogue about teachers’ written feedback enhances students’ understanding on how to improve writing skills

What Aspects of Online Peer Feedback Robustly Predict Growth in Students' Task Performance?

English Education Master Students' Perceptions on Peer Feedback in Academic Writing

Peer Feedback in Translation Training: A Quasi-Experiment in an Advanced Chinese–English Translation Course