Abstract:Providing quality peer feedback and processing and using the received feedback are cognitively challenging activities of formative peer assessment (FPA) for students. The use of technological tools involving theoretically-grounded instructional scaffolds can be one promising solution to support these activities. Accordingly, this mixed methods research utilized scaffolds in an online environment that can activate self-regulated and co-regulated learning during FPA and investigated their impact on peer feedback provision and uptake. It included 70 ninth-grade students assigned into two groups to perform FPA activities for two writing tasks either with online regulation scaffolds (ORS) or without them. Using a new online FPA environment developed by the authors, they composed a story and poem in the first and second writing tasks, respectively. Results regarding peer feedback provision revealed that feedback in the group using ORS was briefer in two writing tasks, but it had significantly higher quality in the first writing task. In terms of feedback uptake, ORS led to more likelihood of reading peer feedback in the first writing task, but the percentage of students revising their performance was similar independent of ORS. Students’ experiences highlighted the role of feedback requests and goal setting and planning. Besides ORS, qualitative results called attention to the influence of task, learner, and feedback characteristics. Overall, this study concludes that ORS can be beneficial for improving peer feedback provision and uptake, especially in the first FPA practices for complex performance tasks. Moreover, it contributes to the development of the FPA model and guides the instructional design of online FPA environments with empirical evidence.

The factor structure of the peer-feedback orientation scale (PFOS): toward a measure for assessing students’ peer-feedback dispositions

Understanding and measuring student engagement in school: the results of an international study from 12 countries.

Students’ perceptions of the peer-feedback experience in MOOCs

Faculty Online Teaching Effectiveness Scale (FOTES): Instrument development and content validation

A systematic review on peer assessment: intrapersonal and interpersonal factors

Peer Feedback Improves Students’ Academic Self-Concept in Higher Education

Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions

Development and validation of the peer assessment motivation scale (PAMS) in higher education

Why students want to provide feedback to their peers: Drivers of feedback quantity and variation by type of course

Pedagogical and Social Climate in School Questionnaire

Validating the Multi-Dimensional Structure of Self-Efficacy Beliefs in Peer Feedback for L2 Writing: A Bifactor-Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling Approach

Peer assessment, self-assessment, and resultant feedback: an examination of feasibility and reliability

Effectiveness of online regulation scaffolds on peer feedback provision and uptake: A mixed methods study

Factors That Determine the Perceived Effectiveness of Peer Feedback in Collaborative Learning: a Mixed Methods Design

Student satisfaction with use of an online peer feedback system

Student Peer Review and Receptiveness to Feedback in Global Classrooms

The European Portuguese version of the Fear of Missing Out scale (FoMOs-P) in higher education students

Peer Feedback Marking: Developing Peer Assessment

Supporting Peer Feedback on Learning Strategies: Effects on Self-Efficacy and Feedback Quality

Establishing the Validity and Reliability of the Student Practice Evaluation Form-Revised (SPEF-R) in Occupational Therapy Practice Education: A Rasch Analysis

Perceived Classroom Responsibility Climate Questionnaire: A new scale