Human footprint and forest disturbance reduce space use of brown bears across Europe.
Anne G Hertel,Aida Parres,Shane C Frank,Julien Renaud,Nuria Selva,Andreas Zedrosser,Niko Balkenhol,Luigi Maiorano,Ancuta Fedorca,Trishna Dutta,Neda Bogdanovi_,Natalia Bragalanti,Silviu Chiriac,Dusco Cirovic,Paolo Ciucci,Csaba Domokos,Mihai Fedorca,Stefano Filacorda,Slavomir Findo,Claudio Groff,Miguel de Gabriel Hernando,Djuro Huber,Georgeta Ionescu,Klemen Jerina,Alexandros A Karamanlidis,Jonas Kindberg,Ilpo Kojola,Yorgos Mertzanis,Santiago Palazon,Mighai I Pop,Maria Psaralexi,Pierre Yves Quenette,Agnieszka Sergiel,Michaela Skuban,Diana Zlatanova,Tomasz Zwijacz-Kozica,Marta De Barba
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.14.607538
2024-08-15
Abstract:Three-quarters of the planets land surface has been altered by humans, with consequences for animal ecology, movements and related ecosystem functioning. Species often occupy wide geographical ranges with contrasting human disturbance and environmental conditions, yet, limited data availability across species ranges has constrained our understanding of how human impact and resource availability jointly shape intraspecific variation of animal space use. Leveraging a unique dataset of 752 annual GPS movement trajectories from 370 brown bears (Ursus arctos) across the species range in Europe, we investigated the effects of human impact (i.e., human footprint index), resource availability, forest cover and disturbance, and area-based conservation measures on brown bear space use. We quantified space use at different spatio-temporal scales during the growing season (May - September): home range size; representing general space requirements, 10-day long-distance displacement distances, and routine 1-day displacement distances. We found large intraspecific variation in brown bear space use across all scales, which was profoundly affected by human footprint index, vegetation productivity, and recent forest disturbances creating opportunity for resource pulses. Bears occupied smaller home ranges and moved less in more anthropized landscapes and in areas of higher resource availability. Forest disturbances reduced space use while contiguous forest cover promoted longer daily movements. The amount of strictly protected and roadless areas within bear home ranges were too small to affect space use. Anthropized landscapes may hinder the expansion of small and isolated populations, such as the Apennine and Pyrenean, and obstruct population connectivity, for example between the Alpine or Carpathian with the Dinaric Pindos populations. Our findings call for actions to maintain bear movements across landscapes with high human footprint, for example by maintaining forest integrity, to support viable bear populations and their ecosystem functions.
Ecology