Anne G Hertel,Aida Parres,Shane C Frank,Julien Renaud,Nuria Selva,Andreas Zedrosser,Niko Balkenhol,Luigi Maiorano,Ancuta Fedorca,Trishna Dutta,Neda Bogdanovi_,Natalia Bragalanti,Silviu Chiriac,Dusco Cirovic,Paolo Ciucci,Csaba Domokos,Mihai Fedorca,Stefano Filacorda,Slavomir Findo,Claudio Groff,Miguel de Gabriel Hernando,Djuro Huber,Georgeta Ionescu,Klemen Jerina,Alexandros A Karamanlidis,Jonas Kindberg,Ilpo Kojola,Yorgos Mertzanis,Santiago Palazon,Mighai I Pop,Maria Psaralexi,Pierre Yves Quenette,Agnieszka Sergiel,Michaela Skuban,Diana Zlatanova,Tomasz Zwijacz-Kozica,Marta De Barba

Abstract:Three-quarters of the planets land surface has been altered by humans, with consequences for animal ecology, movements and related ecosystem functioning. Species often occupy wide geographical ranges with contrasting human disturbance and environmental conditions, yet, limited data availability across species ranges has constrained our understanding of how human impact and resource availability jointly shape intraspecific variation of animal space use. Leveraging a unique dataset of 752 annual GPS movement trajectories from 370 brown bears (Ursus arctos) across the species range in Europe, we investigated the effects of human impact (i.e., human footprint index), resource availability, forest cover and disturbance, and area-based conservation measures on brown bear space use. We quantified space use at different spatio-temporal scales during the growing season (May - September): home range size; representing general space requirements, 10-day long-distance displacement distances, and routine 1-day displacement distances. We found large intraspecific variation in brown bear space use across all scales, which was profoundly affected by human footprint index, vegetation productivity, and recent forest disturbances creating opportunity for resource pulses. Bears occupied smaller home ranges and moved less in more anthropized landscapes and in areas of higher resource availability. Forest disturbances reduced space use while contiguous forest cover promoted longer daily movements. The amount of strictly protected and roadless areas within bear home ranges were too small to affect space use. Anthropized landscapes may hinder the expansion of small and isolated populations, such as the Apennine and Pyrenean, and obstruct population connectivity, for example between the Alpine or Carpathian with the Dinaric Pindos populations. Our findings call for actions to maintain bear movements across landscapes with high human footprint, for example by maintaining forest integrity, to support viable bear populations and their ecosystem functions.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper primarily explores how the European brown bear (Ursus arctos) is affected by factors such as human activity footprints and forest disturbances within its distribution range. Specifically, the study aims to assess the following aspects: 1. **Resource Availability**: The authors hypothesize that in environments where resources are abundant and stable, brown bears can meet their energy needs within a smaller space. Additionally, in early successional forests (i.e., forests that have recently experienced human or natural disturbances), due to the higher availability of food resources like berries, brown bears may occupy smaller territories. 2. **Impact of Human Activities**: Human pressure, measured by the Human Footprint Index (HFI), is expected to significantly affect the spatial use of brown bears, resulting in smaller territory sizes and reduced movement distances. Conversely, in areas with higher forest cover, brown bears may exhibit longer daily movement distances, indicating that continuous natural habitats provide fewer obstacles. 3. **Role of Conservation Measures**: The paper also examines the impact of area-based conservation measures (such as the proportion of protected areas and roadless areas) on the spatial use of brown bears. The authors predict that when brown bear territories include a larger proportion of roadless areas, they will move more; whereas the proportion of protected areas may either promote or restrict movement. 4. **Terrain, Population Density, and Gender**: The paper considers the effects of terrain, national-level brown bear population density, and individual gender. It is expected that in more rugged terrains, brown bears will move more slowly and have smaller territories. As population density increases, territory size is expected to decrease. Additionally, considering the mating system and social organization of brown bears, male brown bears are expected to have larger activity ranges than females. 5. **Other Factors**: Besides the main variables mentioned above, the study also explores the impact of age, reproductive status, and artificial feeding on spatial use patterns, and tests the different responses of genders to environmental variables. In summary, the core aim of this paper is to understand which factors collectively determine the spatial use patterns of the widely distributed European brown bear populations, with a particular focus on the impact of human activities on these patterns.

Human footprint and forest disturbance reduce space use of brown bears across Europe.

Circadian activity of small brown bear populations living in human-dominated landscapes

Activity patterns in the reintroduced Pyrenean brown bear population

Moving in the Anthropocene: Global reductions in terrestrial mammalian movements

Effects of Human Disturbance on Brown Bear Behavior

Behavioural responses of brown bears to roads and hunting disturbance

Effects of environmental factors and landscape features on movement patterns of Florida black bears

Brown bear habitat use patterns across 19 years of population expansion in the Cantabrian Mountains

Investigating the impacts of humans and dogs on the spatial and temporal activity of wildlife in urban woodlands

Seasonality, local resources and environmental factors influence patterns of brown bear damages: implications for management

Human-brown bear conflicts in Türkiye are driven by increased human presence around protected areas

Temporal activity patterns of bears, wolves and humans in the Cantabrian Mountains, northern Spain

Evaluation of the Influence of Human Activity on the Spatio-Temporal Distribution Patterns of Large Carnivores Using Camera Traps in the Central Forest Nature Reserve (West-European Russia)

Seasonal and anthropogenic effects on niche overlap and habitat selection by sympatric bears (Ursus arctos marsicanus) and wolves (Canis lupus) in a human‐dominated landscape

Human disturbance in riparian areas disrupts predator–prey interactions between grizzly bears and salmon

The role of human outdoor recreation in shaping patterns of grizzly bear-black bear co-occurrence

Large Omnivore Movements in Response to Surface Mining and Mine Reclamation

Scale-dependent home range optimality for a solitary omnivore.

Human presence and infrastructure impact wildlife nocturnality differently across an assemblage of mammalian species

Effects of humans on behaviour of wildlife exceed those of natural predators in a landscape of fear

Ecology of fear alters behavior of grizzly bears exposed to bear‐viewing ecotourism