Abstract:We used 3 years of camera trap data from Norway to assess how the interactions among mesocarnivores (red fox, badger, and pine marten) were affected by large carnivores (Eurasian lynx and wolf), land cover variables, and human disturbance, as well as how these top‐down and bottom‐up mechanisms were influenced by season. Our results showed that land cover variables were stronger predictors of mesocarnivore activity than large carnivores in Norway. Human disturbance had contrasting effects for large carnivores and mesocarnivores. Humans can influence species through different top‐down and bottom‐up processes, which highlights the complexity of anthropogenic effects on species interactions. Interactions among coexisting mesocarnivores can be influenced by different factors such as the presence of large carnivores, land‐use, environmental productivity, or human disturbance. Disentangling the relative importance of bottom‐up and top‐down processes can be challenging, but it is important for biodiversity conservation and wildlife management. The aim of this study was to assess how the interactions among mesocarnivores (red fox Vulpes vulpes, badger Meles meles, and pine marten Martes martes) were affected by large carnivores (Eurasian lynx Lynx lynx and wolf Canis lupus), land cover variables (proportion of agricultural land and primary productivity), and human disturbance, as well as how these top‐down and bottom‐up mechanisms were influenced by season. We analyzed 3 years (2018–2020) of camera trapping observations from Norway and used structural equation models to assess hypothesized networks of causal relationships. Our results showed that land cover variables were more strongly associated with mesocarnivore detection rates than large carnivores in Norway. This might be caused by a combination of low density of large carnivores in an unproductive ecosystem with strong seasonality. Additionally, detection rates of all mesocarnivores showed positive associations among each other, which were stronger in winter. The prevalence of positive interactions among predators might indicate a tendency to use the same areas and resources combined with weak interference competition. Alternatively, it might indicate some kind of facilitative relationship among species. Human disturbance had contrasting effects for different species, benefiting the larger mesocarnivores (red fox and badger) probably through food subsidization, but negatively affecting apex predators (wolf and lynx) and smaller mesocarnivores (pine marten). In a human‐dominated world, this highlights the importance of including anthropogenic influences in the study of species interactions.

Seasonal and anthropogenic effects on niche overlap and habitat selection by sympatric bears (Ursus arctos marsicanus) and wolves (Canis lupus) in a human‐dominated landscape

Interactions between carnivore species: limited spatiotemporal partitioning between apex predator and smaller carnivores in a Mediterranean protected area

Spatio-temporal interactions between the red fox and the wolf in two contrasting European landscapes

Temporal activity patterns of bears, wolves and humans in the Cantabrian Mountains, northern Spain

Changes in Wolf Occupancy and Feeding Habits in the Northern Apennines: Results of Long-Term Predator-Prey Monitoring

Circadian activity of small brown bear populations living in human-dominated landscapes

Wolf and wild boar in the Alps: trophic, temporal and spatial interactions in an Alpine protected area

Unified analysis of niche overlap between coyotes (Canis latrans) and gray foxes (Urocyon cinereoargenteus)

Fine-Tuning Coexistence: Wildlife's Short-Term Responses to Dynamic Human Disturbance Patterns

Niche overlap across landscape variability in summer between two large herbivores using eDNA metabarcoding

Intraguild interactions and abiotic conditions mediate occupancy of mammalian carnivores: co‐occurrence of coyotes–fishers–martens

Carcass provisioning and intra-guild risk avoidance between two sympatric large carnivores

Scale-dependent home range optimality for a solitary omnivore.

Bottom‐up rather than top‐down mechanisms determine mesocarnivore interactions in Norway

Eat or be eaten: Implications of potential exploitative competition between wolves and humans across predator-savvy and predator-naive deer populations

Temporal relationships between the red fox and the European badger in a Mediterranean protected area

Seasonality, local resources and environmental factors influence patterns of brown bear damages: implications for management

Same place, different time, head up: Multiple antipredator responses to a recolonizing apex predator

Deer density drives habitat use of establishing wolves in the Western European Alps

Assessing Asiatic black bear (Ursus thibetanus) temporal overlap and co-occurrence with sympatric species in the temperate zone of the Hindu Raj Mountain range

Wildfires affect mesocarnivores habitat use and mammalian predator-prey relationships in a Mediterranean ecosystem